Income Statement and total comprehensive income
- 1 - general information and accounting principles
- 2 - accounting estimates and judgemental considerations
- 3 - segment reporting
- 4 - income from financial investments
- 5 - financial instruments and the use of fair value
- 6 - risik management - investing activities
- 7 - shares and stakes in other companies with ownerships in excess of 10%
- 8 - investment property
- 9 - income taxes
- 10 - geographical allocation of revenue
- 11 - salaries
- 12 - intangible assets
- 13 - goodwill and information on business combinations
- 14 - tangible assets
- 15 - other operating expenses
- 16 - expensed audit fees
- 17 - investments accounted for by the equity method
- 18 - specification of finance income and expense
- 19 - pension costs and liabilities
- 20 - inventories
- 21 - current assets
- 22 - share capital and shareholder information
- 23 - non-controlling interests
- 24 - non-current liabilities
- 25 - other current liabilities
- 26 - assets pledged as security, guarantees and contingent liabilities
- 27 - risk management - operations
- 28 - hedge accounting - operations
- 29 - liquidity risk
- 30 - operating and finance leases
- 31 - related parties
- 32 - events subsequent to the balance sheet date
- 33 - discontinued operations
Income statement 1 January - 31 December
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
Note
|
2015
|
2014
|
OPERATING INCOME AND EXPENSES
|
|||
Sales income
|
12 912 698
|
11 852 804
|
|
Income from financial investments
|
1 985 920
|
599 704
|
|
Other income
|
315 246
|
277 624
|
|
Operating income
|
15 213 863
|
12 730 132
|
|
Cost of sales
|
8 339 234
|
7 381 096
|
|
Salary expenses
|
2 569 759
|
2 301 977
|
|
Depreciation and write-downs
|
773 269
|
540 968
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
1 223 637
|
1 189 578
|
|
Operating expenses
|
12 905 899
|
11 413 618
|
|
Operating profit
|
2 307 964
|
1 316 513
|
|
Income on investments accounted for by the equity method
|
34 548
|
30 367
|
|
Finance income
|
257 478
|
496 336
|
|
Finance expenses
|
- 972 582
|
- 514 901
|
|
Net finance items
|
- 680 556
|
11 802
|
|
Profit before tax
|
1 627 409
|
1 328 315
|
|
Income tax expense
|
318 290
|
463 577
|
|
Profit after tax from continued operations
|
1 309 119
|
864 738
|
|
Profit after tax for discontinued operations
|
101 142
|
83 606
|
|
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
|
1 410 260
|
948 345
|
|
Non-controlling interests' share of profit for the year
|
- 2 293
|
46 006
|
|
Parent company shareholders' share of profit for the year
|
1 412 553
|
902 339
|
|
Total comprehensive income 1 January - 31 December
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
|
1 410 260
|
948 345
|
|
Other income and expenses than can be reclassified to the income statement at a later date:
|
|||
Currency conversion of foreign subsidiaries
|
113 762
|
93 566
|
|
Effect of cash flow hedging
|
95 337
|
- 30 681
|
|
Tax on cash flow hedging
|
- 21 497
|
7 284
|
|
Other income and expenses that cannot be reclassified to the income statement at a later date:
|
|||
Estimate deviation on pensions
|
3 266
|
- 54 690
|
|
Tax on estimate deviation on pensions
|
- 988
|
2 098
|
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
1 600 141
|
965 922
|
|
Non-controlling interests' share of total comprehensive income
|
12 665
|
45 229
|
|
Parent company shareholders' share of total comprehensive income
|
1 587 476
|
920 693
|
NOTE 1
|
GENERAL INFORMATION AND ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
|
|||||||
General information
|
||||||||
Ferd is a family-owned Norwegian investment-company committed to value-creating ownership of businesses and investments in financial assets. In addition to the Group’s purely commercial activities, Ferd has an extensive involvement in social entrepreneurship. Ferd AS is located in Strandveien 50, Lysaker.
|
||||||||
Ferd is owned by Johan H. Andresen and his family. Andresen is the Chair of the Board.
|
||||||||
The Company's financial statements for 2015 were approved by the Board of Directors on 21 April 2016.
|
||||||||
Basis for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||
Ferd AS' consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as approved by the EU.
|
||||||||
Summary of the most significant accounting principles
|
||||||||
The most significant accounting principles applied in the preparation of the financial statements are described below. The accounting principles are consistent for similar transactions in the reporting periods presented, if not otherwise stated.
|
||||||||
Consolidation and consolidated financial statements
|
||||||||
The consolidated financial statements show the overall financial results and the overall financial position for the parent company Ferd AS and entities where Ferd has direct or indirect control. Ferd has control over an investment if Ferd has the decision power over the enterprise in which it has been invested, is exposed to or is entitled to a variable return from the enterprise, and at the same time has the opportunity to use this decision power over the enterprise to influence on the variable return.
|
||||||||
Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries are disclosed as part of equity, but separated from the equity that can be attributed to the shareholders of Ferd AS. The non-controlling interests are either measured at fair value or at the proportionate share of identified net assets and liabilities. The principle for measuring non-controlling interests is determined separately for each business combination.
|
||||||||
Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date when the Group achieves control, and are excluded when such control ceases. Should there be a change in ownership in a subsidiary without any change of control, the change is accounted for as an equity transaction. The difference between the compensation and the carrying value of the non-controlling interests is recognised directly in equity and allocated to the shareholders of Ferd AS. At a loss of control, the subsidiary's assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and any accumulated currency differences are derecognised. Any remaining owner interests at the date of the loss of control are measured at fair value, and gain or loss is recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealised internal gains are eliminated. When required, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting principles in line with those used by the Group.
|
||||||||
Business combinations
|
||||||||
Business combinations are accounted for by the acquisition method. This implies the identification of the acquiring company, the determination of the date for the take-over, the recognition and measurement of identifiable acquired assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interests in the acquired company taken over, and the recognition and measurement of goodwill or gain from an acquisition made on favourable terms.
|
||||||||
Assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities taken over or incurred are measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Goodwill is recognised as the total of the fair value of the consideration, including the value of the non-controlling interests and the fair value of former owner shares, less net identifiable assets in the business combination. Direct costs connected with the acquisition are recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Any contingent consideration from the Group is recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Changes in the value of the contingent consideration considered to be a financial liability pursuant to IAS 39, are recognised in the income statement when incurred. In step-by-step business combinations, the Group’s former stake is measured at fair value at the date of the take-over. Any adjustments in value are recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
||||||||
Should a significant part of the Group's operations be disposed or agreed to be sold, this business is presented as "discontinued operations" on a separate line in the income statement and balance sheet. As a consequence, all other presented amounts are exclusive of the "discontinued operations". Comparable figures for income and expenses are restated in the accounts and notes. Comparable figures for balance sheet items and the statement of cash flows are not restated.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Investments in associates and joint ventures
|
||||||||
Associates are entities over which the Group has significant influence, but not control. Significant influence implies that the Group is involved in strategic decisions concerning the company’s finances and operations without controlling these decisions. Significant influence normally exists for investments where the Group holds between 20 % and 50 % of the voting capital.
|
||||||||
A joint venture is a contractual arrangement requiring unanimous agreement between the owners about strategic, financial and operational decisions.
|
||||||||
Investments in associates and joint ventures are classified as non-current assets in the balance sheet.
|
||||||||
The exemption from using the equity method in IAS 28 for investments in associated companies and joint ventures owned by investing entities is the basis for presenting the investments in the business area Ferd Capital. These investments are recognised at fair value with value changes over profit and loss, and are classified as current assets in the balance sheet.
|
||||||||
Other investments in associates and joint ventures are accounted for by the equity method, i.e., the Group’s share of the associates’ profit or loss is disclosed on a separate line in the income statement. The carrying amount of the investment is added to Ferd's share of total comprehensive income in the investment. The accounting principles are adjusted to bring them in line with those of the Group. The carrying amount of investments in associates is classified as “Investments accounted for by the equity method” and includes goodwill identified at the date of acquisition, reduced by any subsequent write-downs.
|
||||||||
Sales income
|
||||||||
The Group’s consolidated revenue mainly comprises the sale of a wide range of goods to manufacturing companies as well as to consumers, services to the oil sector, IT services and deliveries of packaging and packaging systems.
|
||||||||
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when the potential for earnings and losses has been transferred to the buyer, when income from the sale can be expected and the amount can be reliably measured. Revenue from the sale of services is recognised according to the service’s level of completion, provided the progress of the service and its income and costs can be reliably measured. Should the contract contain several elements, revenue from each element is recognised separately, provided that the transfer of risk and control can be separately assessed. Contracts concerning the sale of filling machines and packaging are commercially connected, and revenue is therefore recognised in total for the contract.
|
||||||||
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the compensation and presented net of discounts, value added tax and similar taxes.
|
||||||||
At the sale of intangible and tangible assets, gain or loss is calculated by comparing the proceeds with the residual carrying value of the sold asset. Calculated gain/loss is included in operating income or expenses, respectively.
|
||||||||
Foreign currency translation
|
||||||||
Transactions in foreign currency in the individual Group entities are recognised and measured in the functional currency of the entity at the transaction date. Monetary items in foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gain and loss arising from changes in foreign currency is recognised in the income statement with the exception of currency differences on loans in foreign currencies hedging a net investment, and inter-company balances considered to be part of the net investment. These differences are recognised as other income in total comprehensive income until the investment is disposed of.
|
||||||||
The consolidated financial statements are presented in Norwegian kroner (NOK), which is the functional currency of the parent company. When a subsidiary in foreign currency is consolidated, income and expense items are translated into Norwegian kroner at an average weighted exchange rate throughout the year. For balance sheet items, including excess values and goodwill, the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date is used. Exchange differences arising when consolidating foreign subsidiaries are recognised in total comprehensive income until the subsidiary is disposed of.
|
||||||||
Loan expenses
|
||||||||
Loan expenses that are directly attributable to the acquisition, manufacturing or production of an asset requiring a long time to be completed before it can be used, are added to the acquisition cost for the asset. For investment properties measured at fair value, Ferd is also capitalising loan expenses incurred in the development period. Ferd is capitalising loan expenses from the starting date for the preparation of the asset for its intended use and the loan expenses begin to incur. The capitalisation continues until these activities have been completed. Should the development be put temporarily on hold, the loan expenses are not capitalised during this period.
|
||||||||
Classification of financial instruments
|
||||||||
Financial instruments constitute a substantial part of Ferd’s consolidated accounts and are of considerable significance for the overall financial standing and result of the Group. Financial assets and liabilities are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the contractual obligations and rights of the instrument. Pursuant to IAS 39, all Ferd’s financial instruments are initially classified in the following categories:
|
||||||||
1. Financial instruments at fair value and with changes in value recognised over profit and loss
|
||||||||
2. Loans and receivables
|
||||||||
3. Financial liabilities
|
||||||||
Financial instruments are classified as held for trading and as part of category 1. Derivatives are classified as held for trading unless they are part of a hedging instrument, another asset or liability. Assets held for trading are classified as current assets.
|
||||||||
Financial instruments at fair value with value changes in the income statement pursuant to IAS 39 can also be classified in accordance with the "fair value option" in IAS 28.18. The instrument must initially be recognised at fair value with value changes over profit and loss and also meet certain criteria. The key assumption for applying the “fair value option” is that a group of financial assets and liabilities are managed on a fair value basis, and that management evaluates the earnings following the same principle.
|
||||||||
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments not quoted in an active market. They are classified as current assets, unless they are expected to be realised more than 12 months after the balance sheet date. Loans and receivables are presented as trade receivables, other receivables and bank deposits in the balance sheet.
|
||||||||
Financial liabilities not included in the category held for trading and not measured at “fair value over profit and loss” are classified as other liabilities. Trade payables and other liabilities are classified as current if the debt is due within one year or is part of the ordinary operating cycle. Debt arisen by utilising Ferd's loan facility is presented as long-term if Ferd both has the opportunity and the intention to revolve the debt more than 12 months.
|
||||||||
Recognition, measurement and presentation of financial instruments in the income statement and statement of financial position
|
||||||||
Purchases and sales of financial instrument transactions are recognised on the date of the agreement. Financial instruments are derecognised when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or have been transferred to another party. Correspondingly, financial instruments are derecognised when the Group on the whole has transferred the risk and reward of the ownership.
|
||||||||
Financial instruments at “fair value over profit and loss” are initially measured at quoted prices at the balance sheet date or estimated on the basis of measurable market information available at the balance sheet date. Transaction costs are recognised in the income statement. In subsequent periods, the financial instruments are presented at fair value based on market values or generally accepted calculation methods. Changes in value are recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Loans and receivables are initially measured at fair value with the addition of direct transactions costs. In subsequent periods, the assets and liabilities are measured at amortised cost by using the effective interest method, less any decline in value. A provision for a decline in value is made for actual and possible losses on receivables. The Group regularly reviews receivables and prepares estimates for losses, as the basis for the provisions in the financial statements. Losses from declines in value are recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Financial obligations classified as other liabilities are measured at amortised cost by using the effective interest method.
|
||||||||
Gain and loss from the realisation of financial instruments, changes in fair values and interest income are recognised in the income statement in the period they arise. Dividend income is recognised when the Group has the legal right to receive payment. Net income related to financial instruments is classified as operating income and presented as “Income from financial investments” in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Financial derivatives and hedge accounting
|
||||||||
The Group applies financial derivatives to reduce the financial loss from exposures to unfavourable changes in exchange rates or interest rates. Financial derivatives related to a highly probable planned transaction (cash flow hedges) are recognised in accordance with the principles for hedge accounting when the hedge has been documented and meets the relevant requirements for effectiveness. Ferd is not applying hedge accounting for derivatives acquired to reduce risk in an asset or liabilities recognised in the balance sheet. Derivatives not qualified for hedge accounting are classified as financial instruments at fair value, and changes in value are recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Cash flow hedging is presented by recognising a change in fair value of the financial derivative applied as cash flow hedging as other income and expenses in total comprehensive income until the underlying transaction is accounted for. The ineffective portion of the hedge is recognised immediately in profit or loss.
|
||||||||
When the hedge instrument expires or is disposed of, the planned transaction is carried out or when the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the accumulated effect of the hedging is recognised in the income statement.
|
||||||||
Income taxes
|
||||||||
The income tax expense includes tax payable and changes in deferred tax. Income tax on other income and expenses items in total comprehensive income is also recognised in total comprehensive income, and tax on balances related to equity transactions are set off against equity.
|
||||||||
The tax payable for the period is calculated according to the tax rates and regulations ruling at the end of the reporting period. Tax payable for the period is calculated on the tax basis deviating from profit before tax as a consequence of amounts that shall be recognised as income or expense in another period (temporary differences) or balances never to be subject to tax (permanent differences)
|
||||||||
Deferred tax is calculated on temporary differences between book and tax values of assets and liabilities and the tax effects of losses to carry forward in the consolidated financial statements at the reporting date. Deferred tax liabilities associated with the initial recognition of goodwill in business combinations are not carried in the balance sheet, nor is deferred tax recognised in the balance sheet on the initial recognition of the acquisition of investment properties, if the purchase of a subsidiary with an investment property is considered as an acquisition of a separate asset.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Deferred tax assets are only recognised in the balance sheet to the extent that it is probable that there will be future taxable profits to utilise the benefits of the tax reducing temporary differences. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are calculated according to the tax rates and regulations ruling at the end of the reporting period and at nominal amounts. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognised net when the Group has a legal right to net assets and liabilities.
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
||||||||
Goodwill is the difference between the cost of an acquisition and the fair value of the Group’s share of net assets in the acquired business at the acquisition date. Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries is classified as intangible assets.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more often if there are indications of impairment, and carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed.
|
||||||||
Goodwill arising on the acquisition of a share in an associate is included in the carrying amount of the investment and tested for impairment as part of the carrying amount of the investment. Gain or loss arising from the realisation of a business includes goodwill allocated to the business sold.
|
||||||||
For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to the relevant cash-generating units. The allocation is made to the cash-generating units or groups of units expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
|
||||||||
Intangible assets
|
||||||||
Intangible assets acquired separately are initially carried at cost. Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognised at their fair value at the time of the combination. In subsequent periods, intangible costs are recognised at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment.
|
||||||||
Intangible assets with a definite economic life are depreciated over their expected useful life. Normally, straight-line depreciation methods are applied, as this generally reflects the use of the assets in the most appropriate manner. This applies for intangible assets like software, customer relations, patents and rights and capitalised development costs. Intangible assets with an indefinite life are not depreciated, but tested for impairment annually. Some of the Group’s capitalised brands have indefinite economic lives.
|
||||||||
Research, development and other in-house generated intangible assets
|
||||||||
Expenses relating to research activities are recognised in the income statement as they arise.
|
||||||||
In-house generated intangible assets arising from development are recognised in the balance sheet only if all the following conditions are met:
|
||||||||
1) The asset can be identified.
|
||||||||
2) Ferd intends to, and has the ability to, complete the intangible asset, including the fact that Ferd has adequate technical, financial and other resources to finalise the development and to use or sell the intangible asset.
|
||||||||
3) The technical assumptions for completing the intangible asset are known.
|
||||||||
4) It is probable that the asset will generate future cash flows.
|
||||||||
5) The development costs can be reliably measured.
|
||||||||
In-house generated intangible assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives from the date when the assets are available for use. When the requirements for capitalisation no longer exist, the expenses are recognised in the income statement as incurred.
|
||||||||
Tangible assets
|
||||||||
Tangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment. The cost includes expenses directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset, including loan costs. Expenses incurred after the acquisition are recognised as assets when future economic benefits are expected to arise from the asset and can be reliably measured. Current maintenance is expensed.
|
||||||||
Tangible assets are depreciated systematically over their expected useful lives, normally on a straight-line basis. When such assets have been capitalised under financial leasing, they are depreciated over the shorter of useful life and agreed lease period. If indications of impairment exist, the asset is tested for impairment.
|
||||||||
Impairment
|
||||||||
Tangible and intangible assets that are depreciated are considered for impairment when there are indications to the effect that future earnings cannot support the carrying amount. If there are indicators on a possible decline in value, an evaluation of impairment is made. Intangible assets with undefined useful lives and goodwill are not depreciated, but evaluated annually for impairment.
|
||||||||
In the assessment of a decline in value, the first step is to calculate or estimate the assets' recoverable amount. Should it not be possible to calculate the recoverable amount for an individual asset, the recoverable amount for the cash-generating unit of which the asset is part, is calculated. A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets generating incoming cash-flows not depending on incoming cash-flows from other assets or groups of assets.
|
||||||||
The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. Fair value less costs to less is the amount that can be recovered at a sale of an asset in a transaction performed at arm’s length between well informed and voluntary parties, less costs to sell. The value in use is the present value of future cash flows expected to be generated by an asset or a cash-generating unit. In the event that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the difference is recognised as a write-down. Write-downs are subsequently reversed when the impairment indicator no longer exists.
|
||||||||
Leasing
|
||||||||
Leases are classified either as operating or finance leases based on the actual content of the agreements. Leases under which the lessee assumes a substantial part of risk and return are classified as finance leases. Other leases are classified as operating leases.
|
||||||||
The object and liability of finance leases with the Group as the lessee is initially recognised at the lower of the object’s fair value and the present value of the minimum lease. Lease payments are apportioned between the liability and finance cost in order to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Variable and contingent lease amounts are recognised as operating costs in the income statement as they incur. Lease objects related to finance lease agreements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term, provided that the Group will not assume ownership by the end of the lease term.
|
||||||||
Finance leases with the Group as the lessor are initially recognised at the beginning of the period as a receivable equal to the Group’s net investment in the lease agreement. The lease payments are apportioned between the repayment of the main balance and finance income. The finance income is calculated and recognised as a constant periodical return on the net investment over the lease period. Direct costs incurred in connection with the lease agreement are included in the value of the asset.
|
||||||||
Leasing costs in operating leases are charged to the income statement when incurred and are classified as other operating expenses.
|
||||||||
Investment property
|
||||||||
Investment properties are acquired to achieve a long-term return on letting out or an increase in value, or both. Investment properties are measured at cost at the acquisition date, including transaction costs. In subsequent periods, investment properties are measured at their assumed fair value.
|
||||||||
Fair value is the price we would have achieved at a sale of the property in a well organised transaction to an external party, carried out on the balance sheet date. Fair value is either based on observable market values, which in reality requires a bid on the property, or a calculation considering rental income from closed lease contracts, an assumption of the future lease level based on the market situation on the balance sheet date and also all available information about the property and the market on which it will be sold, based on market prices. An assumption at the calculation is that the property is utilised in the best possible manner, i.e. in a manner achieving most profit.
|
||||||||
Revenue from investment properties includes the period’s net change in value of the properties together with rental income of the period less property related costs in the same period. Such revenue is classified as other operating income.
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
||||||||
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The costs of inventories are determined on a first-in-first-out basis. The cost of finished goods and goods in progress consists of costs related to product design, consumption of materials, direct wages and other direct costs. The net realisable value is the estimated selling price less estimated variable expenses for completion and sale.
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, bank deposits and other short-term and easily realisable investments that will fall due within 3 months. Restricted funds are also included. Drawings on bank overdraft are presented as current liabilities to credit institutions in the balance sheet. In the statement of cash flows, the overdraft facility is included in cash and cash equivalents.
|
||||||||
Pension costs and pension funds/obligations
|
||||||||
Defined benefit plans
|
||||||||
A defined benefit plan is a pension scheme defining the pension payment that an employee will receive at the time of retirement. The pension is normally determined as a part of the employee's salary. The Group's net obligation from defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each scheme. The obligation is calculated by an actuary and represents an estimate of future retirement benefits that the employees have earned at the balance sheet date as a consequence of their service in the present and former periods. The benefits are discounted to present value reduced by the fair value of the pension funds.
|
||||||||
The portion of the period's net cost that comprises the current year's pension earnings, curtailment and settlement of pension schemes, plan changes and accrued social security tax is included in payroll costs in the period during which the employee has worked and thereby earned the pension rights. The net interest expense on the pension obligation less expected return on the pension funds is charged to the income statement as finance costs in the same period. Positive and negative estimate deviations are recognised as other income and costs in total comprehensive income in the period when they were identified.
|
||||||||
Changes in defined benefit obligations due to changes in pension schemes are recognised over the estimated average remaining service period when the changes are not immediately recognised. Gain or loss on a curtailment or settlement of a benefit plan is recognised in the result when the curtailment or settlement occurs. A curtailment occurs when the Group decides to reduce significantly the number of employees covered by a plan or amends the terms of a defined benefit plan to the effect that a significant part of the current employees’ future earnings no longer qualify for benefits or will qualify for reduced benefits only.
|
||||||||
Defined contribution plans
|
||||||||
Obligations to make contributions to contribution based pension plans are recognised as costs in the income statement when the employees have rendered services entitling them to the contribution.
|
||||||||
Provisions
|
||||||||
A provision is recognised when the Group has an obligation as a result of previous events, it is probable that a financial settlement will take place and the amount can be reliably measured. The amount recognised as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, discounted at present value if the discount effect is significant.
|
||||||||
Dividend
|
||||||||
Dividend proposed by the Board is classified as equity in the financial statements and recognised as a liability only when it has been approved by the shareholders in a Shareholders' Meeting.
|
||||||||
Segments
|
||||||||
Ferd reports segments in line with IFRS 8. Ferd is an investment company, and management makes decisions, is following up and evaluates the decisions based on the development in value and fair value of the Company's investment. Ferd distinguishes between business areas based on investment type/mandate, capital allocation, resource allocation and risk assessment.
|
||||||||
Cash flow statement
|
||||||||
The cash flow statement has been prepared using the indirect method, implying that the basis used is the Group’s profit before tax to present cash flows generated by operating activities, investing activities and financing activities, respectively.
|
||||||||
Related parties
|
||||||||
Parties are considered to be related when one of the parties has the control, joint control or significant influence over another party. Parties are also related if they are subject to a third party’s joint control, or one party can be subject to significant influence and the other joint control. A person or member of a person’s family is related when he or she has control, joint control or significant influence over the business. Companies controlled by or being under joint control by key executives are also considered to be related parties. All related party transactions are completed in accordance with written agreements and established principles.
|
||||||||
New accounting standards according to IFRS
|
||||||||
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and International Financial Reporting Standards - Interpretations Committee (IFRIC), effective for accounting years starting on 1 January 2015 or earlier.
|
||||||||
New and amended standards implemented by Ferd effective from the accounting year 2015
|
||||||||
Ferd has not implemented any new standards in 2015.
|
||||||||
New and amended standards not yet implemented by Ferd
|
||||||||
IFRS 9 Financial instruments
|
||||||||
IFRS 9 will replace the current IAS 39. The project is divided in several phases. The first phase concerns classification and measurement. The classification and measurement requirements for financial liabilities in IAS 39 are on the whole continued. The use of amortised cost and fair value is continued as a basis for measurement. Concretely defined instruments must be measured at amortised cost or at fair value with value changes over other comprehensive income. All other instrument shall be measured at fair value with value changes over profit and loss.
|
||||||||
Phase 2 concerns impairment of financial instruments, and the changes include a twist from making provisions for incurred losses to expected losses. Consequently, the new standard does not require a concrete loss event for making a provision for a credit loss. Provisions shall be made for estimated losses, and changes in these estimates shall also be recognised in the income statement on a current basis. The changes will have particular consequences for banks and lending businesses, but also for Ferd, as the Group has significant receivables from the sale of goods and services that are partly expected to be affected.
|
||||||||
Phase 3 concerns hedge accounting, and the rules in IFRS 9 are considerably more flexible than in IAS 39. Several types of instruments qualify as hedging instruments, more types of risk can be hedged, and even more importantly, the strong effectiveness requirements in IAS 39 have been modified. Instead of testing the effectiveness, IFRS 9 introduces a principle of a qualitative financial connection between a hedging instrument, the hedged object and risk. On the other hand, several new note requirements related to the enterprise's hedging strategy have been added.
|
||||||||
The implementation date for IFRS 9 is determined to accounting years starting on 1 January 2018, but the EU has not yet approved the standard. Ferd will implement the standard when it becomes mandatory.
|
||||||||
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
|
||||||||
IFRS 15 is a joint standard for the recognition of income from customers and replaces IAS 18 Revenue, IAS 11 Construction Contracts, IFRS 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes, IFRIC 15 Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate, IFRIC 18 Transfers of Assets from Customers and SIC 31 Revenue – Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services. IFRS 15 only concerns income from contracts with customers. Revenue relating to liability and equity instruments previously regulated by IAS 18, is moved to IAS 39 (and IFRS 9 when implemented).
|
||||||||
The main principle of IFRS 15 is that the recognition of income shall be made in such a manner that it correctly demonstrates how the compensation for deliveries of goods and services is recognised by the enterprise. IFRS 15 introduces a 5 step model.
|
||||||||
The standard is much more comprehensive and detailed than previous regulations, and it includes many additional guidelines and examples to assist the users to interpret the standard correctly.
|
||||||||
The standard is effective for accounting years starting on 1 January 2018, but it has still not been approved by the EU. The implementation of the standard is expected to have the largest consequences for those of Ferd's subsidiaries that deliver goods and services and where the delivery comprises several products.
|
||||||||
IFRS 16 Leases
|
||||||||
IFRS 16 replaces the existing IFRS for leases, IAS 17 Leases. IFRS 16 states the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure for both parties in a lease agreement, i.e., the customer (lessee) and supplier (lessor). The new standard requires that the lessee recognises assets and liabilities for most lease agreements, which is a significant change from today's principles. For the lessor, IFRS 16 principally carries the existing principles in IAS 17 forward, i.e., lessors shall continue to classify leases as operating or finance lease agreements and account for them differently.
|
||||||||
The new standard is effective for the accounting year starting on 1 January 2019, but has so far not been approved by the EU. The standard is expected to have considerable consequences for those of Ferd's subsidiaries that have significant operating leases for tangible assets used in the manufacturing of goods.
|
NOTE 2
|
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
|
|||||
Management has used estimates and assumptions in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. This applies for assets, liabilities, expenses and disclosures. The underlying estimates and assumptions for valuations are based on historical experience and other factors considered to be relevant for the estimate on the balance sheet date. Estimates can differ from actual results. Changes in accounting estimates are recognised in the period they arise. The main balances where estimates have a significant impact on disclosed values are mentioned below. The methods for estimating fair value on financial assets are also described below.
|
||||||
In Ferd's opinion, the estimates of fair value reflect reasonable estimates and assumptions for all significant factors expected to be emphasised by the parties in an independent transaction, including those factors that have an impact on the expected cash flows, and by the degree of risk associated with them.
|
||||||
Determination of the fair value of financial assets
|
||||||
A large part of the Ferd Group's balance sheet comprises financial assets at fair value. The fair value assessment of financial assets will to varying degrees be influenced by estimates and assumptions related to factors like future cash flows, the required rate of return and interest rate level. The most significant uncertainty concerns the determination of fair value of the unlisted financial assets.
|
||||||
Listed shares and bonds
|
||||||
The fair value of financial assets traded in active and liquid markets is determined at noted market prices on the balance sheet date (the official closing price of the market). Accordingly, the determination of the value implies limited estimation uncertainty.
|
||||||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
||||||
The class “Unlisted shares and bonds” comprises private shares and investments in private equity funds. The fair value is determined by applying well-known valuation models. The use of these models requires input of data that partly constitutes listed market prices and partly estimates on the future development, as well as assessments of a number of factors existing on the balance sheet date.
|
||||||
Hedge funds
|
||||||
The hedge funds are managed by external parties providing Ferd with monthly, quarterly or half-yearly estimates of the fair value. The estimates are verified by independent administrators. In addition, the total return from the funds is assessed for reasonableness against benchmark indices.
|
||||||
Investments in interest-bearing debt
|
||||||
The fair value of investments in interest-bearing debt is determined on the basis of quoted prices. If such prices are not available, the investment is valued in accordance with price models based on the current yield curve and external credit ratings.
|
||||||
Derivatives
|
||||||
The fair value of derivatives is based on quoted market prices. If such prices are not available, the investment is valued in accordance with the current yield curve and other relevant factors.
|
||||||
Determination of the fair value of investment properties
|
||||||
The Ferd Group has several investment properties recognised at fair value. The fair value is based on the discounted value of future cash flows, and the estimate will be impacted by expected future cash flows and the required rate of return. The main principles for determining the cash flows and required rates of return are described below.
|
||||||
Future cash flows are based on the following factors:
|
||||||
Existing contracts
|
||||||
Expected future rentals
|
||||||
Expected vacancies
|
||||||
The required rate of return is based on a market-based rate of return for properties with the assumed best location (prime-yield CBD) with the addition of a risk premium for the property.
|
||||||
The risk premium is based on:
|
||||||
Location
|
||||||
Standard
|
||||||
Expected market development
|
||||||
Rent level compared to the rest of the market
|
||||||
The tenant’s financial strength
|
||||||
Property specific knowledge
|
||||||
In the event of transactions concerning comparable properties close to the balance sheet date, these values are applied as a cross-reference for the valuation.
|
||||||
Properties that are part of development projects are valued by applying the same method, but the uncertainty of the estimates is larger. For development projects, the value of the project is increased in line with achieved milestones.
|
||||||
Impairment considerations of goodwill
|
||||||
Goodwill is tested annually for impairment by discounting expected future cash flows of the cash-generating unit to which goodwill is allocated. If the discounted value of future cash flows is lower than the carrying value, goodwill is written down to the recoverable amount. The impairment tests are based on assumptions of future expected cash flows and estimates of the discount interest rate.
|
||||||
Note 13 has details on the impairment considerations for goodwill.
|
||||||
Depreciation and impairment of tangible and intangible assets
|
||||||
Tangible and intangible assets with definite lives are recognised at cost. The acquisition cost less the residual value is depreciated over the expected useful economic life. The carrying values will depend on the the Group’s estimates on useful lives and residual values. These assumptions are estimated on the basis of experience, history and judgemental considerations. The estimates are adjusted if the expectations change.
|
||||||
Testing for impairment is undertaken when indicators of a permanent decline in value of tangible or intangible assets are identified. These tests are based on estimates and assumptions on future cash flows and discount interest rate.
|
||||||
Pension funds and obligations
|
||||||
The calculation of pension obligations implies the use of judgement and estimates on a number of financial and demographical assumptions. Note 19 has details on the assumptions used. Changes in assumptions can result in significant changes in pension obligations and funds in the balance sheet.
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets of tax losses to carry forward and other tax-reducing differences are recognised in the balance sheet to the extent that it is probable that the deferred tax assets can be utilised against future taxable income. Management is required to use significant judgement to determine the size of the deferred tax assets recognised in the balance sheet. The disclosed value shall be based on expectations of future taxable income, the points in time for utilising the deferred tax asset and future tax planning strategies.
|
||||||
Provision for losses on receivables
|
||||||
The provision for losses on receivables is estimated on the probability for not recovering the outstanding amounts due. The assessment is based on historical experience, the aging of the receivable and the counterparty’s financial situation.
|
NOTE 3
|
SEGMENT REPORTING
|
||||||
Ferd's segment reporting complies with IFRS 8. Ferd is an investment company, and the Company's management makes decisions, monitors and evaluates these decisions based on the development in value and fair value of the Company's investments. The operating segments are identified on the basis of investment type/mandate, capital and resource allocation and risk assessment. Ferd is operating the following four business areas:
|
|||||||
Ferd Capital is a long-term investor working actively with the companies during the period of ownership to secure the development in value to be the best possible. Ferd Capital comprises three mandates: Non-listed companies, listed companies and Special Investment. Special Investments is a mandate in the initial phase.
Those companies where Ferd Capital has control, are consolidated into the group accounts, and the segment reporting in the consolidated financial statements consequently comprises the consolidated results from these companies, in addition to value changes and management costs on non-consolidated companies and other investments . The value of the investments and the value changes are included in Ferd AS' company accounts, where Ferd Capital reports MNOK 286 in operating profit. The value of Ferd Capital's portfolio constitutes MNOK 10 616 at 31 December 2015 and MNOK 10 317 at 31 December 2014 measured at fair value.
|
|||||||
Ferd Capital's largest investments as of 31 Descember 2015 are:
|
|||||||
- Elopak (100 percent stake) is one of the world's leading manufacturers of packaging systems for fluid food articles. With an organisation and cooperating partners in more than 40 countries, the company's products are sold and marketed in more than 100 countries.
|
|||||||
- Aibel (49 percent stake) is a leading supplier to the international upstream oil and gas industry concentrating on the Norwegian shelf. The company is engaged in operating, maintaining and modifying offshore and land based plants, and is also supplying complete production and processing installations.
|
|||||||
- TeleComputing (96 percent stake) is a leading supplier of IT services to small and medium-sized enterprises in Norway and Sweden. The company supplies netbased applications and customised operating and outsourcing services.
|
|||||||
- Interwell (58 percent stake) is a preeminent Norwegian supplier of high-tech well tools to the international oil and gas industry. The company's most important market is the Norwegian shelf, but it has in recent years also gained access to several significant markets internationally.
|
|||||||
- Swix Sport (100 percent stake) is developing, manufacturing and marketing ski wax, ski sticks, accessories and textiles for sporting and active leasure time use. The company has extensive operations in Norway and abroad.
|
|||||||
- Mestergruppen (95 percent stake) is a prominent actor in the Norwegian building materials market concentrating on the professional part of the market. The company's operations include the sale of building materials and developing land and projects, housing and cottage chains.
|
|||||||
- Servi (100 percent stake). Servi develops and manufactures customer specific hydraulics systems, cylinders and vents to the offshore, maritime and land based industries.
|
|||||||
- Petroleum Geo-Services (10,1 percent stake). Petroleum Geo-Services (PGS) supplies seismology, electro-magnetic services and reservoir analyses to oil companies engaged in offshore operations all over the world.
|
|||||||
- Fjord Line (38,5 percent stake). Fjord Line is a modern shipping company offering safe and comfortable sea transport between Norway, Denmark and Svweden. In addition to passenger traffic, Fjord Line has adequate capacity for freight of all types of utility vehicles handled by the shipping company's cargo departments in Norway and Denmark.
|
|||||||
*) The TeleComputing business was sold in 2016, and operations are not included in the segment information of Ferd Capital for 2015. The income statement items for 2014 have been correspondingly restated for presentation purposes. Note 33 has more information.
|
|||||||
Ferd Invest mainly invests in listed Nordic limited companies. The ambition is to beat a Nordic share index (the MSCI Nordic Mid Cap Index). The investment team is not focusing on the reference index in the management of the portfolio, but oncentrates on the companies in which they invest and their development.
|
|||||||
Ferd Hedge Fund comprises two mandates: Hedge funds investing in various types of hedge funds managed by hedge fund environments abroad. The aim is to achieve an attractive risk-adjusted return, both in absolute terms and relatively to the hedge fund index (HFRI FoF: Conservative Index). In the Global Fund Opportunities mandate (GFO), Ferd Hedgefond can invest in externally managed opportunities not suitable for the hedge funds portfolio, but are attractive in view of Ferd's total portfolio and contribute to spread risk in the Group.
|
|||||||
Ferd Real Estate is an active property investor responsible for the Group's efforts concerning property. Developments mainly take place within housing projects, new office buildings and warehouse/combined buildings. The projects are partly carried out in-house, partly together with selected external cooperating partners. Investments concerning financial property only are also made.
|
|||||||
Other areas mainly comprises investments in externally managed private equity funds and hedge funds acquired in the second-hand market. These investments do no require much daily follow-up and are therefore monitored by management. Other areas also comprise some financial instruments to be utilised by management to adjust the total risk exposure. Costs to the company's management, staff and in-house bank are also included.
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Ferd AS Group
|
Ferd Capital
|
Ferd Invest
|
Ferd Hedge Fund
|
Ferd Real Estate
|
Other areas
|
|
Result 2015
|
|||||||
Sales income
|
12 912 698
|
12 910 948
|
|
|
1 750
|
|
|
Income from financial investments
|
1 985 920
|
- 177 017
|
1 419 511
|
144 773
|
119 783
|
478 870
|
|
Other income
|
315 246
|
34 665
|
60
|
- 143
|
278 272
|
2 392
|
|
Operating income
|
15 213 863
|
12 768 596
|
1 419 571
|
144 630
|
399 805
|
481 262
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating expenses excl. depreciation and impairment
|
12 132 630
|
11 996 794
|
9 181
|
11 503
|
46 843
|
68 310
|
|
EBITDA
|
3 081 233
|
771 801
|
1 410 391
|
133 127
|
352 962
|
412 952
|
|
Depreciation and impairment
|
773 269
|
770 004
|
|
68
|
2 153
|
1 045
|
|
Operating profit
|
2 307 964
|
1 797
|
1 410 391
|
133 060
|
350 809
|
411 908
|
|
|
|||||||
Income on investments accounted for by the equity method
|
34 548
|
37 442
|
|
|
- 2 894
|
|
|
Result before finance items and income tax expense
|
2 342 512
|
39 239
|
1 410 391
|
133 060
|
347 915
|
411 908
|
|
Balance sheet as at 31 December 2015
|
|||||||
Intangible assets
|
3 153 719
|
3 153 719
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets and investment properties
|
4 411 260
|
2 057 210
|
|
|
2 346 947
|
7 102
|
|
Investments accounted for by the equity method
|
494 635
|
338 967
|
|
|
155 668
|
||
Investments classified as current asset
|
15 652 095
|
2 031 641
|
6 218 513
|
3 887 561
|
460 530
|
3 053 850
|
|
Bank deposits 1)
|
1 852 737
|
1 175 613
|
53 061
|
41 352
|
173 494
|
409 217
|
|
Other assets
|
6 674 348
|
5 963 617
|
27 259
|
19 947
|
326 031
|
337 495
|
|
Total assets
|
32 238 793
|
14 720 767
|
6 298 833
|
3 948 859
|
3 462 670
|
3 807 664
|
|
1) The business area's net withdrawals from the bank accounts are included here.
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Ferd AS Group
|
Ferd Capital
|
Ferd Invest
|
Ferd Hedge Fund
|
Ferd Real Estate
|
Other areas
|
|
Result 2014
|
|||||||
Sales income
|
11 852 804
|
11 851 557
|
|
|
1 247
|
|
|
Income from financial investments
|
599 704
|
-1 291 897
|
665 319
|
96 164
|
78 267
|
1 051 850
|
|
Other income
|
277 624
|
32 206
|
|
48
|
244 962
|
407
|
|
Operating income
|
12 730 131
|
10 591 866
|
665 319
|
96 213
|
324 476
|
1 052 258
|
|
Operating expenses excl. depreciation and impairment
|
10 872 651
|
10 741 804
|
8 694
|
8 248
|
36 779
|
77 126
|
|
EBITDA
|
1 857 480
|
- 149 938
|
656 625
|
87 965
|
287 697
|
975 132
|
|
Depreciation and impairment
|
540 968
|
535 748
|
40
|
45
|
3 989
|
1 146
|
|
Operating profit
|
1 316 513
|
- 685 685
|
656 585
|
87 919
|
283 707
|
973 986
|
|
Income on investments accounted for by the equity method
|
30 367
|
33 211
|
|
|
- 2 843
|
|
|
Result before finance items and income tax expense
|
1 346 880
|
- 652 475
|
656 585
|
87 919
|
280 864
|
973 986
|
|
Balance sheet at 31 December 2015
|
|||||||
Intangible assets
|
4 117 955
|
4 116 955
|
|
|
1 000
|
|
|
Tangible assets and investment properties
|
4 823 075
|
2 166 416
|
|
|
2 649 138
|
7 521
|
|
Investments accounted for by the equity method
|
442 250
|
312 318
|
|
|
129 932
|
|
|
Investments classified as current asset
|
14 361 391
|
1 438 482
|
5 645 279
|
2 869 671
|
348 035
|
4 059 924
|
|
Bank deposits 1)
|
1 320 725
|
1 520 642
|
11 390
|
- 157 173
|
- 178 796
|
124 662
|
|
Other assets
|
5 819 699
|
4 607 573
|
3 769
|
146 700
|
408 314
|
653 343
|
|
Total assets
|
30 885 095
|
14 162 386
|
5 660 439
|
2 859 197
|
3 357 622
|
4 845 450
|
|
1) The business area's net withdrawals from the bank accounts are included here.
|
NOTE 4
|
INCOME FROM FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS
|
|
Income from financial investments by the various asset classes:
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Listed shares and bonds
|
1 283 119
|
714 795
|
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
- 184 635
|
-1 295 073
|
Hedge funds
|
887 436
|
1 179 982
|
Total income from financial investments
|
1 985 920
|
599 704
|
NOTE 5
|
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND THE USE OF FAIR VALUE
|
|||||||
Ferd's principles in the measurement of fair value, generally
|
||||||||
Ferd applies the valuation method that is considered to be the most representative estimate of an assumed sales value. Such a sale shall be carried out in an orderly transaction at the balance sheet date. As a consequence, all assets for which there is observable market information, or where a transaction recently has been carried out, these prices are applied (the market method). When a price for an identical asset is not observable, the fair value is calculated by another valuation method. In the valuatons, Ferd applies relevant and observable data to the largest possible extent.
|
||||||||
For all investments where the value is determined by another method than the market method, analyses of changes in value from period to period are carried out. Thorough analyses on several levels are made, both overall within the business area, by Ferd's group management and finally by Ferd's Board. Sensitivity analyses for the most central and critical input data in the valuation model are prepared, and in some instances recalculations of the valuation are made by using alternative valuation methods in order to confirm the calculated value.
|
||||||||
Ferd is consistent in the application of valuation method and normally does not change the valuation principles. A change of principles will deteriorate the reliability of the reporting and weaken the comparability between periods. The principle for the valuation and use of method is determined for the investment before it is carried out, and is changed only exceptionally and if the change results in a measurement that under the circumstances is more representative for the fair value.
|
||||||||
Valuation methods
|
||||||||
Investments in listed shares are valued by applying the market method. The quoted price for the most recent carried-out transaction on the market place is the basis.
|
||||||||
Investments in unlisted shares managed in-house are normally valued on the basis of an earnings multiple. In calculating the value (Enterprise Value - EV), ratios like EV/EBITDA, EV/EBITA , EV/EBIT and EV / EBITDA-CAPEX are applied.. Ferd obtains relevant mutiples for comparable companies. The multiples for the portfolio companies are adjusted if the assumptions are not the same as for peer groups. Such assumptions can include a control premium, a liquidity discount, growth assumptions, margins or similar. The company's result applied in the valuation is normalised for one-off ffects. Finally, the equity value is calculated by deducting net interest-bearing debt. In the event that an independent transaction has taken place in the security, this is normally used as a basis for our valuation
|
||||||||
The valuation of investments in externally managed private equity and hedge funds is based on value reports received from the funds (NAV). Ferd makes a critical assessment of whether the reported NAV can be used as a basis.
|
||||||||
Rental properties are valued by discounting future expected cash flows. The value of properties being part of building projects is valued at an assumed sales value on a continuous basis. There is often a shift in value at achieved milestones. Our calculated values are regularly compared to independent valuations.
|
||||||||
The table below is an overview of carrying and fair value of the Group's assets and liabilities and how they are valued in the financial statements. It is the starting point for additional information on the Company's financial risk and refers to notes to follow.
|
||||||||
Investments at fair value over profit and loss
|
Investments at fair value over other comprehensive income
|
Financial instruments measured at amortised cost
|
||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Loans and receivables
|
Financial liability
|
Other valuation methods
|
TOTAL
|
||||
Non-current assets
|
||||||||
Intangible assets
|
3 153 719
|
3 153 719
|
||||||
Deferred tax assets
|
257 916
|
257 916
|
||||||
Tangible assets
|
2 175 360
|
2 175 360
|
||||||
Investments accoundted for by the equity method
|
494 635
|
494 635
|
||||||
Investment property
|
2 235 900
|
2 235 900
|
||||||
Pension funds
|
25 370
|
25 370
|
||||||
Other financial non-current assets
|
137 883
|
85 742
|
223 625
|
|||||
Total 2015
|
2 235 900
|
|
137 883
|
|
6 192 742
|
8 566 524
|
||
Total 2014
|
2 386 449
|
|
190 409
|
|
7 291 683
|
9 868 541
|
||
Current assets
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
2 635 545
|
2 635 545
|
||||||
Short-term receivables
|
61 075
|
2 375 563
|
2 436 638
|
|||||
Listed shares and bonds
|
7 283 017
|
7 283 017
|
||||||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
3 071 613
|
3 071 613
|
||||||
Hedge funds
|
5 202 980
|
5 202 980
|
||||||
Investments in interest-bearing debt
|
94 484
|
94 484
|
||||||
Bank deposits
|
1 852 737
|
1 852 737
|
||||||
Total 2015
|
15 652 095
|
61 075
|
4 228 300
|
|
2 635 545
|
22 577 015
|
||
Total 2014
|
14 361 391
|
11 565
|
4 087 298
|
|
2 556 300
|
21 016 554
|
||
Non-current liabilities
|
||||||||
Pension obligation
|
|
193 138
|
193 138
|
|||||
Deferred tax
|
847 312
|
847 312
|
||||||
Long-term interest-bearing debt
|
4 035 847
|
- 20 798
|
4 015 050
|
|||||
Other long-term debt
|
147 187
|
147 187
|
||||||
Total 2015
|
|
|
|
4 183 034
|
1 019 652
|
5 202 686
|
||
Total 2014
|
|
52 281
|
|
3 939 461
|
963 402
|
4 955 144
|
||
Current liabilities
|
||||||||
Short-term interest-bearing debt
|
|
661 163
|
661 163
|
|||||
Tax payable
|
143 752
|
143 752
|
||||||
Other short-term debt
|
196 537
|
2 833 214
|
3 029 751
|
|||||
Total 2015
|
196 537
|
|
|
3 494 377
|
143 752
|
3 834 665
|
||
Total 2014
|
15 503
|
58 167
|
|
4 166 278
|
359 718
|
4 599 666
|
||
Fair value herarchy - financial assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Ferd classifies assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the balance sheet by a hierarchy based on the underlying object for the valuation. The hierarchy has the following levels:
|
||||||||
Level 1: Valuation based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets without adjustments. An active market is characterised by the fact that the security is traded with adequate frequency and volume in the market. The price information shall be continuously updated and represent expected sales proceeds. Only listed shares are considered to be level 1 investments.
|
||||||||
Level 2: Level 2 comprises investments where there are quoted prices , but the markets do not meet the requirements for being characterised as active. Also included are investments where the valuation can be fully derived from the value of other quoted prices, including the value of underlying securities, interest rate level, exchange rate etc. In addition, financial derivatives like interest rate swaps and currency futures are considered to be level 2 investments. Ferd's hedge fund portfolio is considered to meet the requirements of level 2. These funds comprise composite portfolios of shares, interest securities, raw materials and other negotiable derivatives. For such funds the value (NAV) is reported on a continuous basis, and the reported NAV is applied on transactions in the fund.
|
||||||||
Level 3: All Ferd's other securities are valued on level 3. This concerns investments where all or parts of the information about value cannot be observed in the market. Ferd is also applying valuation models for investments where the share has little or no trading. Securities valued on the basis of quoted prices or reported value (NAV), but where significant adjustments are required, are assessed on level 3. For Ferd this concerns all private equity investments and funds investments made in the second-hand market, where reported NAV has to be adjusted for discounts. A reconciliation of the movements of assets on level 3 is shown in a separate table.
|
||||||||
Ferd allocates each investment to its respective level in the hiearchy at the acquisition. Transfers from one level to another are made only exceptionally and only if there have been changes of significance for the level classification concerning the financial asset. This can be the case when an unlisted share has been listed or correspondingly. A transfer between levels will then take place when the change has been known to Ferd.
|
||||||||
The table shows at what level in the valuation hierarchy the different measurement methods for the Group's financial instruments at fair value is considered to be:
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total 2015
|
||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Investment property
|
2 235 900
|
2 235 900
|
||||||
Short-term receivables
|
61 075
|
61 075
|
||||||
Listed shares and bonds
|
7 283 017
|
7 283 017
|
||||||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
3 071 613
|
3 071 613
|
||||||
Hedge funds
|
3 887 561
|
1 315 420
|
5 202 980
|
|||||
Investments in interest-bearing debt
|
94 484
|
94 484
|
||||||
Liabilities
|
|
|||||||
Other short-term debt
|
- 92 407
|
- 104 129
|
- 196 537
|
|||||
Total 2015
|
7 283 017
|
3 950 712
|
6 518 803
|
17 752 533
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total 2014
|
||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Investment property
|
2 386 449
|
2 386 449
|
||||||
Short-term receivables
|
11 565
|
11 565
|
||||||
Listed shares and bonds
|
6 622 553
|
6 622 553
|
||||||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
3 086 854
|
3 086 854
|
||||||
Hedge funds
|
2 869 671
|
1 782 313
|
4 651 984
|
|||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Other long-term debt
|
- 52 281
|
- 52 281
|
||||||
Other short-term debt
|
- 73 670
|
- 73 670
|
||||||
Total 2014
|
6 622 553
|
2 755 285
|
7 255 616
|
16 633 454
|
||||
Reconciliation of movements in assets on level 3
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Op.bal.1 Jan. 2015
|
Purchases/share issues
|
Sales and proceeds from investments*
|
Unrealised gain and loss, recognised in comprehensive income
|
Unrealised gain and loss, recognised in the result
|
Gain and loss recognised in the result
|
Closing bal. on 31 Dec. 2015
|
|
Investment property
|
2 386 449
|
215 561
|
- 556 228
|
190 117
|
2 235 900
|
|||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
3 086 854
|
634 328
|
- 529 564
|
- 164 691
|
44 687
|
3 071 613
|
||
Hedge funds
|
1 782 313
|
199 069
|
- 730 396
|
- 442 772
|
507 206
|
1 315 420
|
||
Total
|
7 255 616
|
1 048 958
|
-1 816 188
|
|
- 417 346
|
551 893
|
6 622 933
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
Op.bal.1 Jan. 2014
|
Purchases/share issues
|
Sales and proceeds from investments*
|
Unrealised gain and loss, recognised in comprehensive income
|
Unrealised gain and loss, recognised in the result
|
Gain and loss recognised in the result
|
Closing bal. on 31 Dec. 2014
|
|
Investment property
|
1 828 917
|
390 609
|
- 2 435
|
169 358
|
2 386 449
|
|||
Unlisted shares and bonds
|
5 446 096
|
553 599
|
-1 425 596
|
-1 383 158
|
- 104 087
|
3 086 854
|
||
Hedge funds
|
2 017 082
|
92 895
|
- 901 293
|
573 629
|
1 782 313
|
|||
Total
|
9 292 095
|
1 037 103
|
-2 329 324
|
|
- 640 171
|
- 104 087
|
7 255 616
|
|
*Included in sales and disposals are MNOK 686 for Interwell AS, that in 2014 was reclassififed from unlisted shares measured at fair value to subsidiary.
|
||||||||
The table below gives an overview over the most central assumptions used when measuring the fair value of Ferd's investments, allocated to level 3 in the hierarchy. We also show how sensitive the value of the investments is for changes in the assumptions.
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Balance sheet value at 31 Dec. 2015
|
Applied and implicit EBITDA multiples
|
Value, if multiple reduced by 10%
|
Value, if multiple increased by 10%
|
Applied discount rate
|
Value, if interest rate increased by 1 percentage point
|
Value, if interest rate reduced by 1 percentage point
|
|
Investment property 1)
|
2 235 900
|
7.0 % - 11.7 %
|
1 907 000
|
2 724 000
|
||||
Unlisted shares and bonds sensitive for multiple 2)
|
868 777
|
9,2 - 15,7
|
610 777
|
1 126 777
|
||||
Other unlisted shares and bonds sensitive for multiple 2)
|
2 202 836
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Balance sheet value at 31 Dec 2015
|
Estimated discounts acc. to broker (interval)
|
Value if discount increased by 10 %
|
Value if discount reduced by 10 %
|
||||
Hedge fund 3)
|
1 315 420
|
1 % - 83 %
|
1 215 775
|
1 415 064
|
||||
1) Appr. 68% of Ferd Eiendom AS' portfolio constitutes rental property and development projects sensitive for changes in the discount interest rate.
|
||||||||
2) Appr. 28 % of the value of unlisted shares and bonds are sensitive for a change in multiple. The other investments are valued on the basis of reported NAV whereby Ferd cannot calculate the sensitivity, even though multiples probably have been applied in determining NAV.
|
||||||||
2) Appr. 80 % of the investments are sensitive for a change in discount.
|
NOTE 6
|
RISIK MANAGEMENT - INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
There have been no signifcant changes related to the Company's risk management in the period.
|
||||||||
IMPAIRMENT RISK AND CAPITAL ALLOCATION
|
||||||||
Ferd's allocation of capital shall be in line with the owner's risk tolerance. One measure of this risk tolerance is the size of the decline in value in kroner or percent that the owner accepts if any of the markets Ferd is exposed to should experience very heavy and quick downfalls. Ferd's total portfolio shall normally have maximum 35 per cent impairment risk. The impairment risk regulates how large part of equity that can be invested in assets with high risk for impairment. This is measured and followed up by stress tests. The loss risk is assessed as a possible total impairment expressed in kroner and as a percentage of equity. Due to Ferd's long-term approach, the owner can accept significant fluctuations in value-adjusted equity.
|
||||||||
CATEGORIES OF FINANCIAL RISK
|
||||||||
Liquidity risk
|
||||||||
Ferd strongly emphasises liquidity and assumes that the return from financial investments shall contribute to cover current interest costs. Hence, it is important that Ferd's balance sheet is liquid, and that the possibility to realise assets corresponds well with the term of the debt. Ferd has determined that under normal market conditions, at least 4 billion kroner of the financial investments shall comprise assets that can be realised within a quarter of a year. This is primarily managed by investments in listed shares and hedge funds. Note 16 in the parent company's accounts has more information about Ferd's loan facilities, including an overview of due dates of the debt.
|
||||||||
Foreign currency risk
|
||||||||
Ferd is well aware of foreign currency risks. We assume that Ferd always will have a certain part of equity invested in euro, USD and Swedish kroner, and is therefore normally not hedging the currency exposure to Norwegian kroner. If the exposure in a currency is considered to be too high or low, the currency exposure is regulated by loans on the parent company level in the currency in question, or by using derivatives.
|
||||||||
Ferd has the following outstanding currency derivatives on the parent company level as at 31 December 2015:
|
||||||||
Purchases of currency
|
Disposals of currency
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Currency
|
Amount
|
Currency
|
Amount
|
||||
NOK
|
3 486 070
|
USD
|
- 400 000
|
|||||
NOK
|
1 913 430
|
EUR
|
- 200 000
|
|||||
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, IMPAIRMENT RISK IN INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
The stress test is based on a classification of Ferd's equity in different asset classes, exposed for impairment as follows:
|
||||||||
- The Norwegian stock market declines by 30 percent
|
||||||||
- International stock markets decline by 20 percent
|
||||||||
- Property declines by 10 percent
|
||||||||
- The Norwegian krone appreciates by 10 percent
|
||||||||
In order to refine the calculations, it is considered whether Ferd's investments will decline more or less than the market. As an example, it is assumed that the unlisted investments in a stress test scenario have an impairment loss of 1.0-1.3 times the Norwegian market.
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
Price risk: Norwegian shares decline by 30 percent
|
-4 100 000
|
-4 200 000
|
||||||
Price risk: International shares decline by 20 percent
|
-1 700 000
|
-1 700 000
|
||||||
Price risk: Property declines by 10 percent
|
- 300 000
|
- 300 000
|
||||||
Currency risk: The Norwegian krone appreciates 10 percent
|
-1 200 000
|
-1 100 000
|
||||||
Total impairment in value-adjusted equity
|
-7 300 000
|
-7 300 000
|
||||||
Impairment as a percentage of value-adjusted equity
|
28%
|
30%
|
NOTE 7
|
SHARES AND STAKES IN OTHER COMPANIES WITH OWNERSHIPS IN EXCESS OF 10%
|
||
Business office
|
Stake
|
Measurement method
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|||
Elopak AS with subsidiaries
|
Røyken
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
FC Well Invest AS with subsidiaries (Interwell)
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
FC-Invest AS with subsidiaries (TeleComputing)
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Ferd Aibel Holding AS
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
1912 Top Holding AS with subsidiaries (Servi Gruppen)
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Ferd Eiendom AS with subsidiaries
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Ferd Malta Holdings Ltd
|
Malta
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Ferd MG Holding AS with subsidiaries (Mestergruppen)
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Konsolidert
|
Ferd Sosiale Entreprenører AS
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Norse Crown Company Ltd. AS
|
Bærum
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Swix Sport AS with subsidiaries
|
Oslo
|
100,0 %
|
Consolidated
|
Joint ventures
|
|||
Aibel Holding I AS with subsidiaries (Aibel)
|
Stavanger
|
50,0 %
|
Fair value
|
Elocap Ltd
|
Israel
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Frogn Næringspark AS
|
Trondheim
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Sanderveien 18 AS
|
Ski
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Impresora del Yaque
|
Santiago De Los Caballeros, Dominikanske Rep.
|
51,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Associated companies
|
|||
Al-Obeikan Elopak factory for Packaging Co
|
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
49,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Lala Elopak S.A. de C.V.
|
Gómez Palacio, Mexico
|
49,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Tiedemannsbyen DA
|
Oslo
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Lofoten Tomteselskap AS
|
Bodø
|
35,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Hafrsby AS
|
Stavanger
|
14,5 %
|
Equity method
|
Hunstad Sør Tomteselskap AS
|
Bodø
|
31,6 %
|
Equity method
|
Tastarustå Byutvikling AS
|
Stavanger
|
33,3 %
|
Equity method
|
Madla Byutvikling AS
|
Stavanger
|
33,3 %
|
Equity method
|
Boreal GmbH
|
Tyskland
|
20,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Siriskjær AS
|
Stavanger
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Solheim Byutviklingselskap AS
|
Stavanger
|
33,3 %
|
Equity method
|
Sporafjell Utviklingsselskap AS
|
Stavanger
|
50,0 %
|
Equity method
|
Kråkeland Hytteservice AS
|
Sirdal
|
33,5 %
|
Equity method
|
Non-current shares with ownership >10%
|
|||
Herkules Capital I AS
|
40,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Current shares with ownership >10%
|
|||
Fjord Line AS
|
38,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Credo Invest nr 9 AS
|
51,3 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures II AS
|
26,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures II KS
|
22,1 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures III AS
|
25,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures III GP LP
|
25,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures III LP
|
18,7 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Energy Ventures IS
|
19,1 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Harbert European Real Estate Fund II
|
25,9 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Harbert European Real Estate Fund III
|
9,8 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund II (GP-I) Ltd
|
40,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund II (GP-II) Ltd
|
40,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund II (LP-I) Limited
|
74,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund III (GP-I) Ltd
|
4,2 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund III (GP-II) Ltd
|
4,2 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Herkules Private Equity Fund III (LP-I) Limited
|
25,1 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Intera Fund I
|
12,0 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Marical Inc
|
22,4 %
|
Fair value
|
|
NMI AS
|
12,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
NMI Frontier
|
12,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
NMI Fund III
|
28,4 %
|
Fair value
|
|
NMI Global
|
12,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
SPV Herkules II LP
|
81,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Petroleum Geo-Services ASA
|
10,1 %
|
Fair value
|
|
Scatec Solar AS
|
5,1 %
|
Fair value
|
|
SPG Bostad Sverige AB
|
58,5 %
|
Fair value
|
|
SPG Bostad Örebro AB
|
17,2 %
|
Fair value
|
|
SPG Bostad Kronetorp AB
|
37,7 %
|
Fair value
|
NOTE 8
|
INVESTMENT PROPERTY
|
|
Investment property
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Balance at 1 January
|
2 386 449
|
1 828 917
|
Acquisitions
|
75 126
|
65 450
|
Acquisitions through improvements
|
140 436
|
325 159
|
Disposals
|
- 556 228
|
- 2 435
|
Net change in value of investment property
|
190 117
|
169 358
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
2 235 900
|
2 386 449
|
Income from investment property
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Rental income from properties
|
85 858
|
73 612
|
Costs directly attributable to properties
|
- 12 545
|
- 11 226
|
Net change in value of investment property
|
190 117
|
169 358
|
Total
|
263 430
|
231 744
|
Calculation of fair value of investment property
|
||
The investment properties are measured at fair value. Fair value is the amount for which an asset can be traded in a transaction between well-informed, voluntary parties. Market prices are considered when determining the market rent and required rate of return.
|
||
All of the Group's investment properties are measured yearly based on cash flow models. Future cash flows are calculated for signed contracts, as well as future cash flows based on expected market prices. No external valuations have been obtained. Note 2 gives a detailed description of the parameters used to calculate the fair value.
|
NOTE 9
|
INCOME TAXES
|
|
Specification of income tax expenses
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Tax payable of net profit
|
||
Income tax payable for the year
|
269 023
|
295 622
|
Adjustments of prior periods
|
25 556
|
13 422
|
Total tax payable
|
294 579
|
309 444
|
Deferred tax expense
|
||
Change in deferred tax recognised in the income statement
|
106 459
|
124 748
|
Effects of changes in tax rates and prior years' taxes
|
- 82 748
|
29 785
|
Total deferred tax
|
23 711
|
154 533
|
Income tax expense
|
318 290
|
463 577
|
Tax payable in the balance sheet
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Tax payable of the year
|
269 023
|
295 622
|
Tax liability from prior years
|
132 078
|
37 917
|
Advance tax paid
|
- 246 745
|
- 61 546
|
Translation differences
|
- 10 604
|
5 397
|
Tax payable
|
143 752
|
277 390
|
Reconciliation of nominal to effective tax rate
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Profit before tax
|
1 627 409
|
1 328 315
|
Estimated income tax expense at nominal tax rate (27%)
|
439 400
|
358 645
|
Losses and other deductions without any net tax effect
|
17 754
|
- 567
|
Non-taxable net income (-) / costs (+) from securities
|
- 285 351
|
160 951
|
Other non-taxable income
|
- 8 768
|
- 19 605
|
Write-down of goodwill
|
54 000
|
|
Adjustments for prior periods
|
- 57 192
|
43 207
|
Tax effect of other permanent differences
|
158 446
|
- 82 330
|
Income tax expense
|
318 290
|
460 301
|
Effective tax rate
|
19,6 %
|
34,7 %
|
Tax recognised directly in equity
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Actuarial loss on pension obligations (note 19)
|
988
|
2 098
|
Cash flow hedges (note 28)
|
- 21 497
|
7 284
|
Total tax recognised in total comprehensive income
|
- 20 509
|
9 382
|
Deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Inventories
|
10 971
|
- 8 482
|
Receivables
|
7 202
|
8 479
|
Stocks and bonds
|
- 400 934
|
- 359 482
|
Other differences
|
34 925
|
26 314
|
Tangible assets
|
- 2 446
|
- 112 932
|
Investment properties
|
- 177 712
|
- 51 402
|
Intangible assets
|
- 151 087
|
- 273 348
|
Net pensions
|
49 554
|
53 938
|
Tax losses to carry forward
|
329 854
|
389 980
|
Total
|
- 299 673
|
- 326 935
|
Reassessment of deferred tax assets
|
- 289 722
|
- 271 211
|
Net carrying value at 31 December of deferred tax assets (+)/liabilities (-)
|
- 589 395
|
- 598 146
|
Deferred tax assets recognised in balance sheet
|
257 916
|
195 585
|
Deferred tax liabilities recognised in balance sheet
|
- 847 312
|
- 793 731
|
Net carrying value at 31 December of deferred tax assets (+)/liabilities (-)
|
- 589 395
|
- 598 146
|
Deferred tax assets are reviewed on each balance sheet date, and is reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow for the deferred tax asset to be utilised.
|
||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability shall be settled or the asset be realised, based on tax rates and legislation prevailing at the balance sheet date.
|
||
Gross tax losses to carry forward with expiration years
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
|
2015
|
10
|
|
2016
|
||
2017
|
1 517
|
|
After 2017
|
305 615
|
|
Without expiration
|
873 247
|
|
Total tax losses to carry forward
|
1 180 390
|
|
Change in net deferred tax in balance sheet
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Net carrying value at 1 January
|
- 598 146
|
- 229 086
|
Translation differences
|
49 720
|
- 40 938
|
Acquisition and disposal of subsidiary
|
3 251
|
- 156 535
|
Recognised in income statement during the period
|
- 23 711
|
- 180 969
|
Tax recognised in other comprehensive income
|
- 20 509
|
9 382
|
Net carrying value at 31 December
|
- 589 396
|
- 598 146
|
*As a consequence of changed legislation for carried interest in PE funds, Ferd's tax basis from such investments is changed. Ferd made a settlement with the authorities on 8 April 2016 and won the case in the question of deductability for carried interest for the income year 2013. We therefore maintain the balance sheet recording of deferred tax assets related to the deduction for carried interest for 2013 and 2014. As previous years were not part of the settlement and the issue not yet clarified on that point, we cannot recognise deferred tax assets related to these years before Ferd has received a final decision from the tax authorities.
|
NOTE 10
|
GEOGRAPHICAL ALLOCATION OF REVENUE
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Norway
|
4 765 154
|
4 550 952
|
Germany
|
1 403 585
|
1 167 291
|
Sweden
|
602 699
|
517 181
|
USA
|
832 234
|
549 501
|
Netherlands
|
532 035
|
540 645
|
Russia
|
557 618
|
488 551
|
Canada
|
466 838
|
455 394
|
Denmark
|
492 537
|
413 059
|
Great Britain
|
358 469
|
383 705
|
Spain
|
331 123
|
284 621
|
Austria
|
302 658
|
277 656
|
Finland
|
234 245
|
210 081
|
France
|
183 615
|
190 644
|
Rest of the world
|
1 849 887
|
1 823 522
|
Total revenue
|
12 912 698
|
11 852 804
|
Sales revenues are allocated on the basis of where the customers live.
|
NOTE 11
|
SALARIES
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
Salaries
|
2 071 192
|
1 869 789
|
||||||
Social security tax
|
277 064
|
315 867
|
||||||
Pension costs (note 19)
|
133 203
|
71 397
|
||||||
Other benefits
|
88 299
|
44 924
|
||||||
Total
|
2 569 759
|
2 301 977
|
||||||
Average number of man-labour years
|
4 497
|
4 427
|
||||||
Salary and remuneration to Group management
|
||||||||
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Benefits in kind
|
Pension
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Benefits in kind
|
Pension
|
Group CEO, John Giverholt
|
3 416
|
433
|
307
|
1 115
|
3 300
|
3 276
|
186
|
1 062
|
Other members of Group management
|
4 709
|
1 642
|
545
|
812
|
4 550
|
7 627
|
501
|
1 038
|
Total
|
8 125
|
2 075
|
852
|
1 927
|
7 850
|
10 904
|
688
|
2 100
|
The Group CEO's bonus scheme is limited to MNOK 6,0. Bonus is based on the results achieved in the Group.
|
||||||||
The Group CEO participates in Ferd's collective pension schemes for salaries below 12 G. This is a contribution scheme (cf. also note 19). The Group CEO also has a benefit scheme for a pension basis higher than 12 G, but with an upper limit of appr. MNOK 2,2, together with an early retirement pension scheme giving him the opportunity to retire at 65 years.
|
||||||||
The Group CEO is entitled to 9 months' severance pay if he has to resign from his position.
|
||||||||
Fees to the Board
|
||||||||
No specific fees have been paid for board positions in Ferd AS.
|
NOTE 12
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
Goodwill (note 13)
|
1 941 079
|
2 717 241
|
|||||||
Other intangible assets
|
1 212 640
|
1 400 714
|
|||||||
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
3 153 719
|
4 117 955
|
|||||||
2015
|
|||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Software
|
Brands
|
Patents and rights
|
Capitalised development costs
|
Customer relations
|
Total
|
|||
Cost at 1 January
|
355 620
|
165 688
|
694 894
|
309 593
|
856 184
|
2 381 979
|
|||
Additions on acquisitions
|
|
||||||||
Ordinary additions
|
50 264
|
600
|
7 524
|
100 340
|
158 728
|
||||
Disposals
|
- 1 719
|
- 9 430
|
- 11 149
|
||||||
Transfers between asset groups
|
- 3 120
|
3 120
|
|
||||||
Reclassified to assets held for sale
|
- 41 496
|
- 80 400
|
- 21 479
|
- 134 800
|
- 278 174
|
||||
Exchange differences
|
23 368
|
12 615
|
13 685
|
49 668
|
|||||
Cost at 31 December
|
386 038
|
85 888
|
690 434
|
417 308
|
721 384
|
2 301 052
|
|||
Acc. amortisation and impairment at 1 January
|
305 016
|
14 740
|
364 603
|
43 642
|
253 264
|
981 265
|
|||
Additions of amortisations at acquisitions
|
|
||||||||
Current year amortisation charge
|
24 542
|
4 020
|
49 654
|
33 312
|
84 783
|
196 311
|
|||
Disposals
|
- 1 239
|
|
|
- 3 764
|
|
- 5 003
|
|||
Reclassified to assets held for sale
|
- 33 532
|
- 18 760
|
- 14 097
|
- 59 003
|
- 125 393
|
||||
Exchange differences
|
22 472
|
|
16 642
|
2 118
|
|
41 232
|
|||
Accumulated amortisation at 31 December
|
317 259
|
|
416 803
|
75 307
|
279 043
|
1 088 412
|
|||
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
3 918
|
1 000
|
4 918
|
||||||
|
|||||||||
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
68 779
|
85 888
|
273 631
|
342 001
|
442 341
|
1 212 640
|
|||
Economic life
|
3-5 years
|
> 20 years to indefinite
|
3-10 years
|
10 years
|
10-15 years
|
||||
Amortisation method
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
||||
2014
|
|||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Software
|
Brands
|
Patents and rights
|
Capitalised development costs
|
Customer relations
|
Total
|
|||
Cost at 1 January
|
365 967
|
165 438
|
252 896
|
167 193
|
555 962
|
1 507 456
|
|||
Additions on acquisitions
|
1 752
|
358 870
|
52 041
|
300 222
|
712 885
|
||||
Ordinary additions
|
23 526
|
250
|
65 065
|
79 359
|
|
168 200
|
|||
Disposals
|
- 62 749
|
- 62 749
|
|||||||
Exchange differences
|
27 124
|
18 063
|
11 000
|
56 187
|
|||||
Cost at 31 December
|
355 620
|
165 688
|
694 894
|
309 593
|
856 184
|
2 381 979
|
|||
Acc. amortisation and impairment at 1 January
|
310 870
|
10 720
|
240 704
|
3 877
|
118 260
|
684 431
|
|||
Additions of amortisations at acquisitions
|
1 765
|
57 175
|
15 958
|
50 222
|
125 120
|
||||
Current year amortisation charge
|
26 318
|
4 020
|
50 734
|
22 974
|
84 782
|
188 828
|
|||
Disposals
|
- 62 749
|
- 62 749
|
|||||||
Exchange differences
|
28 812
|
15 990
|
833
|
45 635
|
|||||
Accumulated amortisation at 31 December
|
305 016
|
14 740
|
364 603
|
43 642
|
253 264
|
981 265
|
|||
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
50 604
|
150 948
|
330 291
|
265 951
|
602 920
|
1 400 714
|
|
||
Economic life
|
3-5 years
|
> 20 years to indefinite
|
3-10 years
|
10 years
|
10-15 years
|
||||
Amortisation method
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
||||
Research and development
|
|||||||||
Costs expensed to research and development in fiscal year 2015 totalled MNOK 97. The corresponding cost for 2014 was MNOK 149.
|
NOTE 13
|
GOODWILL AND INFORMATION ON BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
|
|||||||
Pursuant to IFRS 3 Business combinations, the net assets of acquired companies have been assessed at fair value at the acquisition date. The remaining part of the consideration after allocating the consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities, is recognised as goodwill. The tables below show the values and movements in the the various goodwill items in the Group.
|
||||||||
2015
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Interwell
|
Servi
|
Elopak Europa
|
Seco Invest (Tele-Computing)
|
Other
|
Total
|
||
Cost at 1 January
|
|
|
1 212 016
|
386 289
|
541 404
|
612 607
|
20 905
|
2 773 221
|
Additions
|
2 000
|
6 327
|
8 327
|
|||||
Disposals
|
|
|||||||
Reclassified to assets held for sale
|
- 618 934
|
- 618 934
|
||||||
Exchange differences
|
38 060
|
11
|
38 071
|
|||||
Cost at 31 December
|
|
|
1 212 016
|
388 289
|
579 464
|
|
20 916
|
2 200 685
|
|
||||||||
Accumulated impairment at 1 January
|
|
|
|
|
55 980
|
|
|
55 980
|
Write-downs
|
200 000
|
200 000
|
||||||
Disposals
|
|
|||||||
Exchange differences
|
3 626
|
3 626
|
||||||
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
|
|
|
200 000
|
59 606
|
|
|
259 606
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
|
|
1 212 016
|
188 289
|
519 858
|
|
20 916
|
1 941 079
|
Changes in 2015
|
||||||||
There were no significant additions of goodwill in2015. Goodwill related to TeleComputing has been reclassified to assets held for sale as a consequence of the coming sale of the business.
|
||||||||
Ferd has decided to write down goodwill related to Servi by MNOK 200, recognised as depreciation and write-down in other comprehensive income. The reason for the write-down is the negative development in the oil price and the resulting market challenges for Servi.
|
||||||||
2014
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Interwell
|
Servi
|
Elopak Europa
|
Seco Invest (Tele-Computing)
|
Other
|
Total
|
||
Cost at 1 January
|
|
|
386 289
|
508 398
|
593 969
|
16 680
|
1 505 336
|
|
Additions
|
1 212 016
|
18 638
|
4 330
|
1 234 984
|
||||
Disposals
|
- 105
|
- 105
|
||||||
Exchange differences
|
33 006
|
33 006
|
||||||
Cost at 31 December
|
1 212 016
|
386 289
|
541 404
|
612 607
|
20 905
|
2 773 221
|
||
Accumulated impairment at 1 January
|
|
|
|
52 047
|
|
|
52 047
|
|
Additions
|
|
|||||||
Write-downs
|
|
|||||||
Disposals
|
3 933
|
3 933
|
||||||
Exchange differences
|
|
|
|
|
55 980
|
|
|
55 980
|
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
||||||||
1 212 016
|
386 289
|
485 424
|
612 607
|
20 905
|
2 717 241
|
|||
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
||||||||
Changes in 2014
|
||||||||
In 2014, Ferd increase its stake from 34 % to 58 % in Interwell and thereby achieved control over the company. The acquisition was made with accounting effect from 1 January 2014. The purchase has increased Ferd's patents and rights by MNOK 298 (note 7), capitalised development costs by MNOK 36, customer relations by MNOK 250, in addition to a goodwill of appr. MNOK 1212. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The cost for the shares in Interwell AS constitutes appr. MNOK 895, of which MNOK 496 were paid cash in 2014 and MNOK 399 were the value of the shares before the acquisition. Before the purchase, the shares in Interwell were measured at fair value with value changes over profit and loss. MNOK 601 in non-controlling interest at the acquisition date have been recognised, calculated as their proportionate share of the enterprise's identifiable net assets. Interwell's impact on Ferd's consolidated financial statments amounted to MNOK 856 in operating income and MNOK 315 in EBITDA in 2014.
|
||||||||
Impairment testing for goodwill
|
||||||||
Goodwill is allocated to the Group's cash generating units, and is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if there are indications of impairment. Testing for impairment implies determining the recoverable amount of the cash generating unit. The recoverable amount is determined by discounting future expected cash flows, based on the cash generating unit's business plans. The discount rate applied to the future cash flows is based on the Group's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), adjusted to the market's appreciation of the risk factors for each cash generating unit. Growth rates are used to project cash flows beyond the periods covered by the business plans.
|
||||||||
Cash generating units
|
||||||||
The goodwill items specified above relate to Ferd Capital's investments in the group companies Elopak, TeleComputing, Interwell, Servi, in addition to some minor goodwill items in the sub-groups Swix and Mestergruppen.
|
||||||||
Goodwill concerning Elopak is allocated to the cash generating unit Europa, which consists of Elopak's European markets, including the in-house production and supply organisation. This goodwill has a carrying value of MNOK 520 at 31 December 2015. The rationale for determining Europe as one cash-generating unit is the dynamics of this market. The trend is that customers are merging, and have easy access to the supplies all over Europe. Elopak adapts to its customers by distributing the production of cartons for the various markets according to the optimal production efficiency in Europe. The historical geographical criteria for production and demands from customers are no longer as important. As a consequence of this development, the split of margins along Elopak's value chain will be subject to change from one year to another. Hence, one European business unit will be the best indicator for assessing any impairment of goodwill.
|
||||||||
Goodwill related to TeleComputing concerns TeleComputing's operations in Norway and Sweden. The goodwill has a carrying amount of MNOK 618 as at 31 December 2015. For impairment purposes, TeleComputing is considered to be one cash generating unit due to similar activities and the synergy effects achieved acrosss the companies under Seco Invest AS. TeleComputing was sold in 2016 and therefore reclassified to assets held for sale as at 31 December 2015.
|
||||||||
Goodwill identified at the acquisition of Servi is allocated to Servi in total as the cash generating unit. This is a consequence of Servi's co-ordinated and well integrated activities. The carrying value at 31 December 2015 is MNOK 188 following a write-down of MNOK 200 (cf. above for details).
|
||||||||
The acquisition of Interwell in 2014 has implied a recognition of goodwill of MNOK 345 for Ferd. This goodwill is allocated to the whole of Interwell as one joint cash-generating unit, which is the level on which Ferd is following up Interwell. In the Interwell group, however, there are an additional MNOK 867 in goodwill from acquisitions carried out by Interwell. This goodwill is allocated to two separate cash-generating units, Interwell Norge and Interwell Technology, as these business areas generate ingoing cash-flows separately.
|
||||||||
Impairment testing and assumptions
|
||||||||
The recoverable amount for the cash generating unit is calculated on the basis of the present value of expected cash flows. The cash flows are based on assumptions about future sales volumes, selling prices and direct costs. The background for these assumptions is historical experience from the market, adopted budgets and the Group's expectations of market changes. Having carried out impairment testing, the Group does not expect significant changes in current trade. This implies that expected future cash flows mainly are a continuation of observed trends.
|
||||||||
Determined cash flows are discounted at a discount interest rate. The rate applied and other assumptions are shown below.
|
||||||||
For Servi, the calculated recoverable amount indicates a write-down of MNOK 200. The recoverable amount is the company's value in use based on estimated cash-flows discounted at the company's required rate of return (cf. the table below for applied assumptions).
|
||||||||
For the other cash-generating units, the calculated recoverable amount in the impairment tests are positive, and based on these tests, the conclusions are that there is no impairment requiring write-downs in 2015. The uncertainty connected with the assumptions on which the impairment testing is based is illustrated by sensitivity analyses. The conclusions are tested for changes in discount and growth rates. The sensitivity analyses indicate that a large gap is required before there can be any question of impairment.
|
||||||||
Detailed description of the assumptions applied:
|
||||||||
Discount rate after tax (WACC)
|
Discount rate before tax
|
Growth rate 2-5 years
|
Long-term growth rate
|
|||||
2015
|
2014
|
2015
|
2014
|
2015
|
2014
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Elopak Europa
|
3,9 %
|
4,0 %
|
5,5 %
|
5,7 %
|
2,0 %
|
2,0 %
|
0,0 %
|
0,0 %
|
Seco Invest
|
4,0 %
|
4,4 %
|
5,4 %
|
5,9 %
|
8,0 %
|
8,0 %
|
0,0 %
|
0,0 %
|
Servi
|
10,0 %
|
5,9 %
|
5,0 %
|
3,5 %
|
2,5 %
|
2,5 %
|
||
Interwell Norge
|
9,0 %
|
10,0 %
|
5,0 %
|
5,0 %
|
2,0 %
|
2,0 %
|
||
Interwell Technology
|
9,0 %
|
10,0 %
|
10,0 %
|
25,0 %
|
2,0 %
|
2,0 %
|
||
The discount rate reflects the market's assessment of the risk specific to the cash generating unit. The rate is based on the weighted average cost of capital for the industry. This rate has been further adjusted to reflect the specific risk factors related to the cash generating unit, which has not been reflected in the cash flows. As Elopak's functional currency is euro, the basis has also been a euro interest significantly lower than NOK interest rates.
|
||||||||
The average growth rate in the period 2 to 5 years is based on Ferd's expectations for the development in the market in which the business operates. Ferd uses a stable growth rate to extrapolate the cash flows beyond 5 years.
|
||||||||
EBITDA represents operating profit before depreciation and is based on the expected future market development. Committed operating efficiency improvement measures are taken into account. Changes in the outcomes for these initiatives may influence future estimated EBITDA.
|
||||||||
Investment costs necessary to meet expected future growth are taken into account. Based on management's assessment, the estimated investment costs do not include investments that improve the current assets' performance. The related cash flows are treated correspondingly.
|
NOTE 14
|
TANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|||
2015
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Buildings and land
|
Machines and installations
|
Fixtures and equipment
|
Total
|
Cost at 1 January
|
810 082
|
5 284 366
|
329 163
|
6 423 611
|
Additions on acquisitions
|
57 928
|
57 928
|
||
Ordinary additions
|
1 800
|
479 366
|
46 068
|
527 234
|
Disposals
|
- 233 609
|
- 254 535
|
- 25 159
|
- 513 303
|
Transfer between asset groups
|
4 497
|
- 12 437
|
7 940
|
|
Reclassification to assets held for sale
|
- 515 621
|
- 17 257
|
- 532 877
|
|
Exchange differences
|
42 933
|
258 680
|
19 699
|
321 312
|
Cost at 31 December
|
683 631
|
5 239 820
|
360 454
|
6 283 905
|
Accumulated depreciation and impairment at 1 January
|
339 122
|
3 400 030
|
247 833
|
3 986 985
|
Accumulated depreciation on acquisitions
|
- 180
|
- 180
|
||
Depreciation of the year
|
25 592
|
433 785
|
31 500
|
490 876
|
Impairment of the year
|
1 130
|
222
|
1 352
|
|
Derecognised depreciation
|
- 13 453
|
- 218 875
|
- 14 565
|
- 246 893
|
Transfer between asset groups
|
1 246
|
- 1 246
|
|
|
Reclassification to assets held for sale
|
- 347 542
|
- 10 485
|
- 358 027
|
|
Exchange differences
|
23 564
|
204 522
|
6 345
|
234 432
|
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December
|
374 825
|
3 474 295
|
259 425
|
4 108 545
|
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
2 788
|
50 230
|
318
|
53 336
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
308 806
|
1 765 524
|
101 029
|
2 175 360
|
Estimated economic life of depreciable assets
|
5-50 år
|
5-15 år
|
3-13 år
|
|
Depreciation plan
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
|
Land is not depreciated
|
||||
2014
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Buildings and land
|
Machines and installations
|
Fixtures and equipment
|
Total
|
Cost at 1 January
|
652 461
|
4 503 762
|
279 758
|
5 435 981
|
Additions on acquisitions
|
429 621
|
44 396
|
474 017
|
|
Ordinary additions
|
136 057
|
574 131
|
35 390
|
745 578
|
Disposals
|
- 14 109
|
- 456 848
|
- 38 964
|
- 509 921
|
Exchange differences
|
35 673
|
233 700
|
8 583
|
277 956
|
Cost at 31 December
|
810 082
|
5 284 366
|
329 163
|
6 423 611
|
Accumulated depreciation and impairment at 1 January
|
302 377
|
2 990 885
|
227 651
|
3 520 913
|
Accumulated depreciation on acquisitions
|
192 060
|
16 357
|
208 417
|
|
Depreciation of the year
|
21 880
|
399 897
|
28 369
|
450 146
|
Impairment of the year
|
6 924
|
6 924
|
||
Derecognised depreciation
|
- 4 693
|
- 391 402
|
- 34 488
|
- 430 583
|
Exchange differences
|
19 558
|
201 666
|
9 944
|
231 168
|
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December
|
339 122
|
3 400 030
|
247 833
|
3 986 985
|
Accumulated impairment at 31 December
|
2 788
|
46 975
|
279
|
50 042
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
470 960
|
1 884 336
|
81 330
|
2 436 626
|
Estimated economic life of depreciable assets
|
5-50 years
|
5-15 years
|
3-13 years
|
|
Depreciation plan
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
Straight-line
|
|
Land is not depreciated
|
NOTE 15
|
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Sales and administration costs
|
214 600
|
212 231
|
Lease of buildings etc.
|
245 856
|
207 318
|
Fees to auditors, lawyers, consultants
|
174 774
|
153 482
|
Travel expenses
|
186 215
|
173 887
|
Loss and change in write-downs of trade receivables
|
14 842
|
60 407
|
Other expenses
|
387 351
|
382 253
|
Total
|
1 223 637
|
1 189 578
|
NOTE 16
|
EXPENSED AUDIT FEES
|
||||
Ernst & Young AS is Ferd's Group auditor. Some Group companies are audited by other audit firms.
|
|||||
NOK 1 000
|
Audit fees
|
Other attestation services
|
Tax services
|
Other non-audit services
|
Total
|
2015
|
|||||
Ernst & Young
|
12 125
|
434
|
5 770
|
7 302
|
25 631
|
Others
|
2 704
|
760
|
2 379
|
3 812
|
9 655
|
Total
|
14 829
|
1 194
|
8 150
|
11 114
|
35 287
|
2014
|
|||||
Ernst & Young
|
11 313
|
176
|
5 649
|
1 986
|
19 123
|
Others
|
2 450
|
9
|
970
|
2 064
|
5 494
|
Total
|
13 763
|
185
|
6 619
|
4 050
|
24 617
|
Other non-audit services mainly concern due diligence services.
|
|||||
All amounts are exclusive of VAT.
|
NOTE 17
|
INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR BY THE EQUITY METHOD
|
||||||
Investments in associates and joint ventures are in Ferd's consolidated accounts accounted for by the equity method.
|
|||||||
A specification of companies and shares is given in the statement of investments in associates and joint ventures in note 15.
|
|||||||
2015
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Al-Obeikan Elopak factory for Packaging Co
|
Lala Elopak S.A. de C.V.
|
Tiedemanns-byen DA
|
Others
|
Total
|
||
Ownership and voting share
|
49%
|
49%
|
50%
|
||||
Cost at 1 January
|
58 325
|
165 051
|
106 768
|
81 585
|
411 729
|
||
Share of result at 1 January
|
92 990
|
134 025
|
20 158
|
7 040
|
254 213
|
||
Accumulated impairment of goodwill at 1 January
|
- 12 600
|
|
|
- 1 941
|
- 14 541
|
||
Transfer from the company
|
- 37 063
|
- 114 006
|
- 12 765
|
- 5 865
|
- 169 699
|
||
Recognised directly in equity
|
- 3 550
|
- 3 550
|
|||||
Exchange differences/eliminations
|
- 13 358
|
- 15 213
|
|
- 7 331
|
- 35 902
|
||
Carrying amount at 1 January
|
84 744
|
169 857
|
114 161
|
73 488
|
442 250
|
||
Additions of the year
|
33 890
|
33 890
|
|||||
Disposals of the year
|
- 461
|
- 461
|
|||||
Sales during the year
|
|
||||||
Share of the result of the year
|
9 791
|
23 628
|
- 2 894
|
2 305
|
32 830
|
||
Write-down of goodwill
|
|
||||||
Transfers from the company
|
- 19 893
|
- 14 042
|
|
- 33 934
|
|||
Recognised directly in equity
|
|
|
|||||
Exchange differences/eliminations
|
15 747
|
257
|
4 055
|
20 059
|
|||
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
90 390
|
179 700
|
111 267
|
113 278
|
494 635
|
||
|
|
||||||
2014
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Al-Obeikan Elopak factory for Packaging Co
|
Lala Elopak S.A. de C.V.
|
Tiedemanns-byen DA
|
Harbert European Real Estate Fund II
|
Harbert European Real Estate Fund III
|
Others
|
Total
|
Ownership and voting share
|
49%
|
49%
|
50%
|
26%
|
22%
|
||
Cost at 1 January
|
58 325
|
165 051
|
106 768
|
112 002
|
95 974
|
106 046
|
644 165
|
Share of result at 1 January
|
82 874
|
117 986
|
23 002
|
82 977
|
22 236
|
- 17
|
329 058
|
Accumulated impairment of goodwill at 1 January
|
- 12 600
|
|
|
|
|
- 1 582
|
- 14 182
|
Transfer from the company
|
- 29 879
|
- 98 878
|
- 12 765
|
- 63 826
|
- 23 517
|
- 5 865
|
- 234 730
|
Exchange differences/eliminations
|
- 29 799
|
- 28 034
|
|
- 3 053
|
- 293
|
- 15 966
|
- 77 145
|
Carrying amount at 1 January
|
68 921
|
156 125
|
117 005
|
128 100
|
94 400
|
82 616
|
647 167
|
Additions of the year
|
9 370
|
9 370
|
|||||
Disposals of the year
|
- 131 153
|
- 94 693
|
- 20 212
|
- 246 058
|
|||
Sales during the year
|
- 13 619
|
- 13 619
|
|||||
Share of the result of the year
|
10 116
|
16 039
|
- 2 844
|
7 057
|
30 367
|
||
Write-down of goodwill
|
- 359
|
- 359
|
|||||
Transfers from the company
|
- 7 184
|
- 15 128
|
|
- 22 312
|
|||
Recognised directly in equity
|
- 3 550
|
|
- 3 550
|
||||
Exchange differences/eliminations
|
16 441
|
12 821
|
3 053
|
293
|
8 635
|
41 244
|
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
84 744
|
169 857
|
114 161
|
|
|
73 488
|
442 250
|
The table below shows a summary of financial information related to Ferd's largest investments in associates and joint ventures on a 100 percent basis. The stated figures represent fiscal year 2015. The figures are unaudited.
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Al-Obeikan Elopak factory for Packaging Co
|
Lala Elopak S.A. de C.V.
|
Tiedemanns-byen DA
|
||||
Operating revenue
|
216 573
|
310 540
|
19
|
||||
Profit after tax and minority
|
11 931
|
23 869
|
- 4 729
|
||||
Total assets
|
175 514
|
239 566
|
701 590
|
||||
Total liabilities
|
102 579
|
90 940
|
477 998
|
||||
- Al-Obeikan Elopak is a cardboard manufacturer with a plant in Saudi Arabia selling cardboard to customers in the Middle East and North Africa.
|
|||||||
- Lala Elopak is a cardboard manufacturer with a plant in Mexico selling cardboard to the market in North and Sourth America.
|
|||||||
- Tiedemannsbyen DA is owned by Ferd and Skanska engaged in developing residential housing on the old manufacturing site of Tiedemann's tobacco plant on Ensjø.
|
|||||||
Stake, transactions and balances with enterprises accounted for by the equity method:
|
|||||||
Stake/voting share
|
Sales from associates companies and joint ventures to Ferd
|
Ferd's net receivables/(payables) to associated companies and joint ventures
|
Ferd's guarantees for associated companies and joint ventures
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2015
|
2014
|
2015
|
2014
|
2015
|
2014
|
Al-Obeikan Elopak factory for Packaging Co
|
49,0 %
|
9 910
|
4 068
|
201 797
|
140 346
|
||
Boreal GmbH
|
20,0 %
|
|
|
||||
Elocap Ltd.
|
50,0 %
|
8 587
|
|||||
Frogn Næringspark AS
|
50,0 %
|
- 16 625
|
|||||
Hafrsby AS
|
14,5 %
|
||||||
Hunstad Sør Tomteselskap AS
|
31,6 %
|
10 712
|
|
|
|||
Impresora Del Yaque
|
51,0 %
|
23 607
|
807
|
1 368
|
|||
Kråkeland Hytteservice AS
|
33,5 %
|
|
|
||||
Lala Elopak S.A. de C.V.
|
49,0 %
|
120 140
|
15 044
|
- 6 011
|
1 701
|
|
|
Lofoten Tomteselskap AS
|
35,0 %
|
1 610
|
|
|
|||
Madla Byutvikling AS
|
33,3 %
|
|
|
||||
Sanderveien 18 AS
|
50,0 %
|
5 207
|
|||||
Siriskjær AS
|
50,0 %
|
59
|
|||||
Solheim Utbyggingsselskap AS
|
33,3 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sporafjell Utviklingsselskap AS
|
50,0 %
|
5 262
|
|||||
Tastarustå Byutvikling AS
|
33,3 %
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiedemannsbyen DA
|
50,0 %
|
1 375
|
4 172
|
|
|
||
Total
|
120 140
|
48 613
|
- 6 713
|
28 952
|
201 797
|
140 346
|
NOTE 18
|
SPECIFICATION OF FINANCE INCOME AND EXPENSE
|
|
Finance income
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Interest income from bank deposits
|
32 213
|
44 762
|
Interest income from related parties
|
23 814
|
21 596
|
Other interest income
|
9 454
|
7 440
|
Foreign exchange gain and other finance income
|
191 997
|
422 537
|
Total
|
257 478
|
496 336
|
Finance expense
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Interest expense to finance institutions
|
142 333
|
150 966
|
Interest expense to related parties
|
18 000
|
26 158
|
Other interest expense
|
39 378
|
48 748
|
Foreign exchange loss and other finance expenses
|
772 871
|
289 029
|
Total
|
972 582
|
514 901
|
Neither of these finance items results form financial instruments measured at fair value.
|
NOTE 19
|
PENSION COSTS AND LIABILITIES
|
||
THE GROUP'S PENSION PLANS
|
|||
Ferd has established pension schemes in accordance with Norwegian legislation. The employees participate in defined benefit and defined contribution plans complying with the requirements of the mandatory occupational pension.
|
|||
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
|
|||
Defined benefit plans provide employees with the right to defined future pension benefits. The Group's net obligation in respect of defined benefit pension plans is calculated separately for each pension plan. The obligation is an estimate of future benefits that employees have earned based on years of service and salary at retirement. Benefits are discounted to present value, and the recognised obligation is reduced by the fair value of plan assets for funded pension schemes. Changes in assumptions, staff numbers and variances between estimated and actual salary increases and return on assets result in actuarial gains and losses. Actuarial gains and losses and gains and losses resulting from a curtailment or termination of pension plans are recognised immediately in the income statement.
|
|||
The defined benefit pension plans consist of group schemes as well as some additional arrangements, including employees with a retirement basis over 12 G, and AFP.
|
|||
Defined contribution plans
|
|||
For defined contribution plans, the Group's obligations are limited to making specific contributions. Payments to defined contribution pension plans are recognised as expenses in the income statement when the employees have rendered services entitling them to the contribution.
|
|||
Other service related long-term benefits
|
|||
In addition to the pension schemes described above, Ferd has obligations related to future health services for some groups of employees in the USA.
|
|||
ECONOMIC ASSUMPTIONS
|
|||
Ferd has defined benefit plans in several countries with varying economic conditions affecting the assumptions that are the basis for calculating pension obligations. The parameters are adapted to conditions in each country. The discount rate is determined as a weighted average of the yields at the reporting date on at least AA rated corporate bonds, or government bonds in cases where there is no market for AA rated corporate bonds. The government bond interest rate is applied for Norwegian schemes. To the extent that the bond does not have the same maturity as the obligation, the discount rate is adjusted. Actuarial assumptions for demographic factors and retirement are based on generally accepted principles in the insurance business. Future mortality rates are based on statistics and mortality tables (K2013).
|
|||
Economic assumptions in Norwegian companies at 31 December
|
|||
2015
|
2014
|
||
Discount rate
|
1,90%
|
2,70%
|
|
Expected wage growth
|
2,50%
|
3,25%
|
|
Future expected pension regulation
|
1,75%
|
1,75%
|
|
Expected regulation of base amount (G)
|
2,25%
|
3,00%
|
|
Interval for economic assumptions in foreign companies at 31 December
|
|||
2015
|
2014
|
||
Discount rate
|
0.75 - 4.08 %
|
1.10 - 4.52 %
|
|
Expected wage growth
|
0.00 - 1.00 %
|
0.00 - 3.75 %
|
|
Future expected pension regulation
|
0.00 - 1.75 %
|
0.00 - 1.75 %
|
|
PENSION OBLIGATIONS
|
|||
Reconciliation of net liability against balance sheet
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Pension liabilities for defined benefit pension plans
|
- 193 138
|
- 169 417
|
|
Pension assets for defined benefit pension plans
|
25 370
|
17 391
|
|
Total defined benefit obligation recognised in the Group's balance sheet
|
- 167 768
|
- 152 026
|
|
DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
|
|||
Specification of recognised liability
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Present value of unfunded pension liabilities
|
- 63 867
|
- 56 988
|
|
Present value of wholly or partly funded obligations
|
- 599 766
|
- 556 128
|
|
Total present value of defined benefit obligations
|
- 663 634
|
- 613 116
|
|
Fair value of pension assets
|
495 865
|
461 090
|
|
Total defined benefit obligation recognised in the Group's balance sheet
|
- 167 768
|
- 152 026
|
|
Movements in liabilities for defined benefit pension plans
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Liability for defined benefit pension plans at 1 January
|
613 116
|
669 253
|
|
Present value of current service cost
|
10 533
|
17 655
|
|
Interest expenses on the pension liability
|
18 435
|
17 359
|
|
Demographic estimate deviation on the pension liability
|
- 17 783
|
3 214
|
|
Financial estimate deviation on the pension liability
|
5 626
|
70 510
|
|
Settlement of pension plans
|
- 6
|
- 200 726
|
|
Curtailment of pension plans
|
- 15 612
|
||
Change in liability due to acquisition/sale of subsidiaries
|
9 167
|
||
Benefits paid
|
- 43 452
|
- 22 416
|
|
Social security tax
|
- 396
|
73
|
|
Exchange differences on foreign plans
|
77 894
|
64 639
|
|
Liability for defined benefit pension plans at 31 December
|
663 967
|
613 116
|
|
Expected payments of defined pension liabilities
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
||
Defined benefit pension expected to fall due year 1-5
|
209 334
|
||
Defined benefit pension expected to fall due year 6-10
|
207 846
|
||
Defined benefit pension expected to fall due year 11-20
|
235 890
|
||
Defined benefit pension expected to fall due year 21-30
|
10 898
|
||
Total benefit pension due
|
663 967
|
||
Movement in fair value of pension assets for defined benefit pension plans
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Fair value of pension assets at 1 January
|
461 090
|
532 085
|
|
Expected return from pension assets
|
13 584
|
13 317
|
|
Financial estimate deviation on the pension assets
|
- 8 891
|
19 034
|
|
Contributions from employer
|
12 363
|
10 285
|
|
Administration expenses
|
- 1 270
|
- 1 604
|
|
Contributions from employees
|
1 699
|
1 320
|
|
Increase in pension funds due to the acquisition of subsidiaries
|
8 297
|
||
Settlements
|
- 2 829
|
- 154 268
|
|
Benefits paid
|
- 39 369
|
- 18 535
|
|
Exchange difference on foreign plans
|
59 489
|
51 159
|
|
Fair value of pension assets at 31 December
|
495 865
|
461 090
|
|
Pension assets include the following
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
Of which active market:
|
2015
|
2014
|
Equity instruments
|
118 894
|
120 613
|
96 343
|
Government stock
|
298 102
|
351 254
|
271 396
|
Corporate stock
|
5 257
|
6 475
|
58 276
|
Other debt instruments, including structured debt
|
358
|
441
|
4 279
|
Property investments
|
1 333
|
11 328
|
24 102
|
Bank deposits
|
538
|
2 093
|
1 602
|
Other assets
|
2 099
|
3 661
|
5 092
|
Total pension funds
|
426 581
|
495 865
|
461 090
|
Actuarial deviations recognised in othercomprehensive income
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Current year actuarial deviation on pension liabilities (defined benefit schemes)
|
12 157
|
- 73 724
|
|
Current year actuarial deviation on pension funds (defined benefit schemes)
|
- 8 891
|
19 034
|
|
Tax effect (note 9)
|
- 988
|
2 098
|
|
Net actuarial deviation on defined benefit schemes
|
2 278
|
- 52 592
|
|
PENSION COSTS
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Defined benefit plans
|
17 893
|
- 28 071
|
|
Defined contribution plans
|
115 310
|
131 120
|
|
Total pension costs recognised in current year payroll costs
|
133 203
|
103 049
|
|
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN PENSION COSTS
|
|||
Pension costs recognised in income statement
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Present value of this year's pension earned
|
10 533
|
17 655
|
|
Contribution from employees
|
- 1 699
|
- 1 320
|
|
Curtailment of pension schemes and plan changes
|
8 185
|
- 46 083
|
|
Social security tax
|
- 396
|
73
|
|
Administration costs
|
1 270
|
1 604
|
|
Total pension costs from benefit schemes recognised in salary costs
|
17 893
|
- 28 071
|
|
Interest expense on the pension liability
|
18 435
|
17 359
|
|
Expected return on pension funds
|
- 13 584
|
- 13 317
|
|
Total pension costs from benefit schemes recognised in finance costs
|
4 850
|
4 042
|
NOTE 20
|
INVENTORIES
|
|||
2015
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Raw materials
|
Work in progress
|
Finished goods
|
Total
|
Cost at 31 December
|
472 241
|
1 018 493
|
1 299 888
|
2 790 621
|
Provision for obsolescence at 1 January
|
12 150
|
21 069
|
123 085
|
156 304
|
Write-down
|
6 358
|
34 026
|
9 802
|
50 186
|
Reversal of write-down
|
- 4 685
|
|
- 52 240
|
- 56 926
|
Currency translation
|
- 22
|
2 410
|
3 123
|
5 511
|
Provision for obsolescence at 31 December
|
13 801
|
57 505
|
83 770
|
155 076
|
Carrying value at 31 December
|
458 440
|
960 987
|
1 216 118
|
2 635 545
|
2014
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Raw materials
|
Work in progress
|
Finished goods
|
Total
|
Cost at 31 December
|
421 481
|
858 501
|
1 257 741
|
2 537 723
|
Provision for obsolescence at 1 January
|
9 528
|
|
122 591
|
132 119
|
Additions from acquisition of subsidiary
|
5 313
|
5 313
|
||
Write-down
|
2 054
|
21 069
|
19 709
|
42 832
|
Reversal of write-down
|
- 4 997
|
- 25 628
|
- 30 625
|
|
Currency translation
|
252
|
6 413
|
6 665
|
|
Provision for obsolescence at 31 December
|
12 150
|
21 069
|
123 085
|
156 304
|
Carrying value at 31 December
|
409 331
|
837 432
|
1 134 656
|
2 381 419
|
NOTE 21
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Prepayments
|
106 207
|
114 737
|
VAT and tax receivables
|
156 783
|
116 382
|
Current interest-bearing receivables
|
|
1 098
|
Other current receivables
|
668 963
|
1 047 303
|
Reclassification to assets held for sale
|
- 21 897
|
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
910 056
|
1 279 520
|
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Accounts receivable, gross
|
1 822 124
|
1 714 512
|
Write-down of receivables
|
- 105 705
|
- 41 013
|
Reclassification to assets held for sale
|
- 189 836
|
|
Carrying amount at 31 December
|
1 526 583
|
1 673 499
|
Total current receivables
|
2 436 638
|
2 953 019
|
Overdue accounts receivable by age
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Up to 30 days
|
202 207
|
207 049
|
30-60 days
|
58 841
|
68 377
|
60-90 days
|
53 022
|
80 524
|
Over 90 days
|
106 288
|
77 167
|
Total
|
420 358
|
433 117
|
NOTE 22
|
SHARE CAPITAL AND SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
|
||
The share capital of the Company consists of 183.267.630 shares at a nominal value of NOK 1.-.
|
|||
Owner structure
|
|||
The shareholder as at 31 December 2015 was:
|
|||
Number of shares
|
Stake
|
||
Ferd Holding AS
|
183 267 630
|
100,00%
|
|
Total number os shares
|
183 267 630
|
100,00%
|
|
Ferd AS is a subsidiary of Ferd Holding AS, being a subsidiary of Ferd JHA AS. Ferd shares offices with its parent companies in Lysaker, Bærum. For the consolidated financial statements of Ferd JHA AS, please contact Ferd.
|
|||
Shares indirectly owned by the CEO and board members in Ferd AS:
|
Position
|
Voting rights
|
Stake
|
Johan H. Andresen
|
Chair of the Board
|
69,94%
|
15,20%
|
Johan H. Andresen's children own 84,8 percent of Ferd AS indirectly by ownership of shares in Ferd Holding AS.
|
NOTE 23
|
NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
|
||
Subsidiary
|
Interwell AS
|
Mestergruppen AS
|
Totals
|
Business office
|
Stavanger
|
Oslo
|
|
Ferd's stake and voting share
|
58,1 %
|
94,5 %
|
|
Non-controlling share
|
41,9 %
|
5,5 %
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
|||
Non-controlling interest 1 Jan. 2015
|
667 323
|
17 221
|
684 544
|
Dividends and capital changes
|
- 6 224
|
1 090
|
- 5 134
|
Transactions with non-controlling interests
|
- 316
|
- 390
|
- 706
|
Other comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
8 959
|
3 706
|
12 665
|
Non-controlling interest at 31 Dec. 2015
|
669 743
|
21 627
|
691 369
|
Summary of financial information from subsidiaries:
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
Interwell AS
|
Mestergruppen AS
|
|
Operating income
|
807 265
|
2 875 739
|
|
Operating profit
|
38 209
|
104 407
|
|
Profit after tax
|
16 239
|
71 684
|
|
Non-current assets
|
1 380 666
|
168 345
|
|
Current assets
|
448 654
|
796 325
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
297 089
|
264 286
|
|
Current liabilities
|
129 384
|
383 287
|
NOTE 24
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
||
Long-term interest-bearing debt
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
Loan amount in currency 2015
|
Loan amount in NOK 2015
|
Loan amount in NOK 2014
|
NOK
|
1 881 064
|
1 881 064
|
1 876 019
|
USD
|
1 000
|
8 821
|
11 111
|
EUR
|
145 000
|
1 392 435
|
1 242 927
|
DKK
|
330 000
|
424 654
|
418 623
|
CAD
|
30 000
|
190 591
|
|
SEK
|
115 090
|
120 557
|
136 748
|
CHF
|
2 000
|
17 726
|
19 467
|
Carrying value of loan expenses
|
- 20 798
|
- 7 002
|
|
Carrying value at 31 December
|
4 015 050
|
3 697 893
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
147 187
|
294 103
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
4 162 236
|
3 991 996
|
|
Instalments determined in contracts
|
|||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
||
2016
|
240 608
|
||
2017
|
170 255
|
||
2018
|
2 627 462
|
||
2019
|
228 794
|
||
2020 or later
|
915 916
|
||
Total
|
4 183 034
|
||
The first year's instalment of long-term debt is presented as part of the short-term interest-bearing debt.
|
NOTE 25
|
OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Trade payables
|
1 792 514
|
1 500 253
|
Public duties etc.
|
291 311
|
260 265
|
Other short-term debt
|
1 327 247
|
1 247 692
|
Reclassified to liabilities held for sale
|
- 381 323
|
|
Total
|
3 029 751
|
3 008 210
|
NOTE 26
|
ASSETS PLEDGED AS SECURITY, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
|
Secured borrowings
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Loan facilities
|
2 690 499
|
2 793 173
|
Factoring
|
76 824
|
24 525
|
Total
|
2 767 323
|
2 817 698
|
Loan facilities comprise various credit facilities in the Group, normally secured by receivables, inventories, tangible assets and investment property. Interest terms are floating interest rates.
|
||
Carrying amounts of pledged assets
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Investment property
|
1 673 006
|
1 499 663
|
Other tangible assets
|
505 030
|
618 578
|
Inventories
|
1 214 351
|
876 988
|
Receivables
|
946 674
|
840 472
|
Other assets
|
136 111
|
|
Total
|
4 475 171
|
3 835 701
|
Maximum exposure to the above assets
|
4 475 171
|
3 835 701
|
Guarantees and off-balance sheet liabilities
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Committed capital to fund investments
|
739 426
|
655 462
|
Committed equity contributions to company investments
|
343 500
|
397 614
|
Guarantees without security
|
997 844
|
939 783
|
Clauses on minimum purchases in agreements with suppliers
|
242 821
|
255 789
|
Other obligations 1)
|
526 349
|
130 285
|
Total
|
2 849 941
|
2 378 933
|
1) Other obligations mainly concern repurchase commitments on sales of machines and investment obligations relating to developing investment property and the building of manufacturing plants.
|
NOTE 27
|
RISK MANAGEMENT - OPERATIONS
|
||||
Risk management relating to the investment activities of Ferd is described in note 6.
|
|||||
Currency risk
|
|||||
Contracted currency flows from operations are normally secured in their entirety, while projected cash flows are hedged to a certain extent. Interest payments related to the Group's foreign currency loans are mostly secured by corresponding cash flows from the Group's activities. Instruments such as currency forward contracts, currency swaps and options can be used to manage the Group's currency exposure.
|
|||||
Outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts related to operations:
|
|||||
Purchase of currency
|
Sale of currentcy
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Currency
|
Amount
|
Currency
|
Amount
|
|
NOK
|
329 111
|
EUR
|
- 35 610
|
||
NOK
|
3 651
|
EUR
|
- 400
|
||
NOK
|
7 934
|
SEK
|
- 8 000
|
||
EUR
|
1 000
|
CAD
|
- 1 522
|
||
EUR
|
830
|
CHF
|
- 898
|
||
EUR
|
9 450
|
DKK
|
- 70 581
|
||
EUR
|
1 380
|
GBP
|
- 1 017
|
||
EUR
|
9 766
|
JPY
|
-1 307 924
|
||
EUR
|
6 770
|
SEK
|
- 62 419
|
||
EUR
|
4 920
|
USD
|
- 5 378
|
||
EUR
|
4 400
|
NOK
|
- 41 078
|
||
JPY
|
5 410 100
|
EUR
|
- 40 575
|
||
PLN
|
5 054
|
EUR
|
- 1 190
|
||
RUB
|
40 200
|
EUR
|
- 500
|
||
CAD
|
9 099
|
EUR
|
- 6 000
|
||
ILS
|
4 771
|
EUR
|
- 1 120
|
||
GBP
|
192
|
EUR
|
- 260
|
||
USD
|
18 050
|
NOK
|
- 148 638
|
||
USD
|
31 798
|
EUR
|
- 29 100
|
||
Appr. 15% of the foreign exchange forward contracts with the purchase of JPY /sale of EUR mature in 2017. All other foreign exchange forward contracs are due in the course of 2016.
|
|||||
Interest rate risk
|
|||||
The Group has short-term fixed interest rates on long-term funding in accordance with internal guidelines. This applies for loans in Norwegian kroner, as well as in foreign currency. The Group uses interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate exposure by switching from floating rates to fixed rates for a portion of the loans.
|
|||||
Outstanding interest rate swaps
|
|||||
NOK 1 000
|
Currency
|
Amount
|
Receives
|
Pays
|
Time remaining to maturity
|
DKK
|
50 000
|
6M CIBOR
|
Fixed 2.97%
|
1 year
|
|
EUR
|
110 000
|
3M EURIBOR
|
Fixed 0.28% - 2.88%
|
0.5 - 5.0 years
|
|
NOK
|
150 000
|
1,12%
|
Fixed 2.43%
|
0.5 year
|
|
The table includes derivatives for hedging.
|
|||||
Credit risk
|
|||||
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will default on his/her contractual obligations resulting in a financial loss to the Group. Ferd has adopted a policy implying that the Group shall be exposed only to credit-worthy counterparties, and independent credit analyses are obtained for all counterparties when such analyses are available. If not, the Group uses other publicly available financial information and its own trade to assess creditworthiness.
|
NOTE 28
|
HEDGE ACCOUNTING - OPERATIONS
|
|||||||
The hedging reserve comprises the effective portion of the cumulative net change in fair value of cash flow hedges related to hedged transactions that have not yet taken place. Movements in the hedging reserve are described in the table below.
|
||||||||
2015
|
2014
|
|||||||
NOK 1 000
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Currency futures
|
Commodity swaps
|
Total
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Currency futures
|
Commodity swaps
|
Total
|
Opening balance
|
- 21 834
|
- 30 132
|
- 11 700
|
- 63 666
|
- 7 728
|
- 25 002
|
- 2 997
|
- 35 726
|
Gain/loss on cash flow hedges
|
- 4 367
|
15 537
|
47 818
|
58 987
|
- 27 090
|
- 15 161
|
- 13 583
|
- 55 834
|
Income/expense recognised in the income statement
|
14 606
|
10 283
|
14 552
|
39 441
|
10 884
|
7 226
|
3 550
|
21 660
|
Currency translation
|
- 886
|
- 6 766
|
- 15 832
|
- 23 484
|
- 1 238
|
921
|
- 733
|
- 1 050
|
Deferred tax (note 9)
|
53
|
- 3 745
|
262
|
- 3 430
|
3 337
|
1 885
|
2 062
|
7 284
|
Effect of cash flow hedging in comprehensive income
|
9 405
|
15 309
|
46 800
|
71 514
|
- 14 106
|
- 5 130
|
- 8 703
|
- 27 940
|
Closing balance
|
- 12 429
|
- 14 823
|
35 100
|
7 848
|
- 21 834
|
- 30 132
|
- 11 700
|
- 63 666
|
Negative amounts represent a liability and a reduction in equity.
|
||||||||
Gain/loss transferred from other income and expenses in the income statement of the period is included in the following items in the income statement:
|
||||||||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
||||||
Commodity costs
|
- 15 528
|
- 6 307
|
||||||
Other operating expenses
|
- 9 308
|
- 5 947
|
||||||
Net finance result
|
- 14 606
|
- 9 406
|
||||||
Total
|
- 39 441
|
- 21 660
|
||||||
Negative amounts represent income.
|
NOTE 29
|
LIQUIDITY RISK
|
|||
Liquidity risk - operations
|
||||
Liquidity risk concerning operations relates primarily to the risk that Elopak, Seco (parent company of TeleComputing), Mestergruppen, Servi and Swix will not be able to service their financial obligations as they fall due. This risk is managed by maintaining adequate cash reserves and overdraft opportunities in banking and credit facilities, as well as continuously monitoring future and actual cash flows.
|
||||
The following tables provide an overview of the Group's contractual maturities of financial liabilities. The tables are compiled based on the earliest date the Group can be required to pay.
|
||||
31 Deember 2015
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
Total
|
Finance institutions
|
661 164
|
320 253
|
3 715 594
|
4 697 011
|
Accounts payable
|
1 764 385
|
1 764 385
|
||
Other non-current liabilities
|
86 776
|
60 410
|
147 186
|
|
Public taxes and other current liabilities
|
1 279 343
|
1 279 343
|
||
Total 1)
|
3 704 892
|
407 029
|
3 776 004
|
7 887 925
|
31 December 2014
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
Total
|
Finance institutions
|
1 331 032
|
324 828
|
2 359 894
|
4 015 754
|
Accounts payable
|
1 500 253
|
1 500 253
|
||
Other non-current liabilities
|
151 847
|
162 703
|
314 550
|
|
Public taxes and other current liabilities
|
1 247 394
|
1 247 394
|
||
Total 1)
|
4 078 679
|
476 675
|
2 522 597
|
7 077 951
|
1) The table does not include lease obligations, guarantees and off-balance sheet liabilities, cf. notes 26 and 30 respectively.
|
||||
The table below shows the anticipated receipts and payments on derivatives:
|
||||
31 December 2015
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
More than 3 years
|
Total
|
Net settlement
|
|
|||
Interest rate swaps
|
- 16 409
|
- 13 204
|
- 317
|
- 29 930
|
Currency futures
|
- 72 289
|
- 874
|
- 73 163
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
51 309
|
51 309
|
||
Total
|
- 37 389
|
- 14 078
|
- 317
|
- 51 784
|
31 December 2014
|
||||
NOK 1 000
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
More than 3 years
|
Total
|
Net settlement
|
|
|||
Interest rate swaps
|
- 1 202
|
22 313
|
- 2 088
|
19 023
|
Currency futures
|
- 38 659
|
- 22 761
|
- 61 420
|
|
Commodity derivatives
|
- 14 634
|
- 14 634
|
||
Total
|
- 54 495
|
- 448
|
- 2 088
|
- 57 031
|
Credit facilities
|
||||
The table below shows a summary of used and unused credit facilities at 31 December:
|
||||
2015
|
2014
|
|||
Used
|
Unused
|
Used
|
Unused
|
|
Overdraft
|
||||
Secured
|
34 003
|
6 297 600
|
175 351
|
251 149
|
Unsecured
|
48 015
|
384 120
|
114 813
|
694 233
|
Credit facilities
|
||||
Secured
|
632 947
|
314 894
|
2 701 490
|
7 578 816
|
Unsecured
|
2 045 439
|
1 939 806
|
||
Factoring
|
||||
Secured
|
57 618
|
19 206
|
20 376
|
4 149
|
Unsecured
|
480 150
|
547 371
|
703 872
|
236 412
|
Total secured
|
724 569
|
6 631 700
|
2 897 217
|
7 834 114
|
Total unsecured
|
2 573 604
|
2 871 297
|
818 685
|
930 645
|
NOTE 30
|
OPERATING AND FINANCE LEASES
|
||
The Group as lessor, operating leases
|
|||
The Group leases fixtures and equipment under operating leases. Essentially, equipment is rented out to Elopak's customers who use them in their own production.
|
|||
Specification of income on operating leases
|
|||
2015
|
2014
|
||
Total variable leases recognised as income
|
120 545
|
110 555
|
|
Total
|
120 545
|
110 555
|
|
At the balance sheet date, the Group has contracted the following future minimum leases:
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Totally due next year
|
115 552
|
93 034
|
|
Totally due in 2-5 years
|
290 599
|
282 959
|
|
Totally due after 5 years
|
48 428
|
31 356
|
|
Total
|
454 579
|
407 349
|
|
The amounts have not been discounted.
|
|||
The Group as lessor, finance leases
|
|||
Specification of income from finance leases
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Total variable leases recognised as income
|
13 013
|
17 617
|
|
Total income from finance leases
|
13 013
|
17 617
|
|
Gross investment compared to the present value of outstanding minimum leases
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Gross receivables on lease agreements
|
13 963
|
17 617
|
|
Finance income not yet earned
|
- 1 719
|
- 2 439
|
|
Net investment from finance leases (present value)
|
12 244
|
15 178
|
|
The Group as lessee, operating leases
|
|||
Specification of expenses on operating leases
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Total variable leases recognised as expenses
|
221 649
|
158 824
|
|
Minimum leases (including fixed leases) recognised as expense
|
124 103
|
183 310
|
|
Subleases recognised as cost reductions
|
- 790
|
- 171
|
|
Total leasing costs
|
344 963
|
341 963
|
|
Due for payment
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Total costs next yeaar
|
357 735
|
338 231
|
|
Total costs 2-5 years
|
981 547
|
947 479
|
|
Total costs after 5 years
|
988 847
|
822 811
|
|
Total
|
2 328 128
|
2 108 521
|
|
The amounts have not been discounted.
|
|||
Distribution of the same leasing obligation on leasing objects
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Buildings and land
|
1 783 085
|
1 799 654
|
|
Machines and installations
|
404 968
|
207 495
|
|
Fixtures, vehicles and equipment
|
140 075
|
101 372
|
|
Total leasing obligations related to operating lease commitments
|
2 328 128
|
2 108 521
|
|
The Group as lessee, finance leasing
|
|||
Specification of leasing costs of the year
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Total variable leases recognised as expenses
|
2 100
|
6 610
|
|
Total leasing costs
|
2 100
|
6 610
|
|
Future minimum leases and corresponding present values, by due dates:
|
Minimum rent
|
Calculated interest
|
Present value
|
Total due in one year
|
1 077
|
25
|
1 052
|
Total due in year 2-5
|
131
|
8
|
123
|
Total due after 5 years
|
|||
Total leasing obligations related to finance leasing
|
1 208
|
33
|
1 175
|
Net carrying value of leased assets, by asset class
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
Fixtures, vehicles and equipment
|
5 235
|
4 005
|
|
Total carrying value of leased assets
|
5 235
|
4 005
|
|
The fixed assets are also included in the tangible asset note (note 14).
|
NOTE 31
|
RELATED PARTIES
|
Associated companies and joint ventures
|
|
Transactions with associated companies and joint ventures are accounted for in note 12.
|
|
The Board and executives
|
|
The board members' rights and obligations are determined in the Company's Articles of Association and Norwegian legislation. There are no significant agreements with enterprises where a board member has significant interest. Ownership in Ferd AS by board members is shown in note 22, and information on fees to board members and executives in note 11.
|
NOTE 32
|
EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE BALANCE SHEET DATE
|
In January 2016, Ferd AS sold the business TeleComputing to Investeringsfondet IK Investment partners. The sale was finalised in March 2016 (cf. note 33).
|
|
Ferd made a settlement with the authorities on 8 April 2016 and won the case in the question of deductability for carried interest for the income year 2013. We therefore maintain the balance sheet recording of deferred tax assets related to the deduction for carried interest for 2013 and 2014. As previous years were not part of the settlement and the issue not yet clarified on that point, we cannot recognise deferred tax assets related to these years before Ferd has received a final decision from the tax authorities.
|
NOTE 33
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
In January 2016, Ferd AS sold the business TeleComputing to Investeringsfondet IK Investment Partners. The sale was finalised in March 2016. The assets and liabilities being part of the transaction are presented as held for sale in the consolidated financial statements as at 31 December 2015. The income statement items from the sold business are presented net on a separate line in the consolidated financial statements for 2015 and 2014. Cash flows are correspondingly restated for 2015.
|
||
The income statement for TeleComputing classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2015
|
||
NOK 1 000
|
2015
|
2014
|
Sales income
|
1 462 379
|
1 274 893
|
Operating income
|
1 462 379
|
1 274 893
|
Cost of goods sold
|
391 046
|
304 878
|
Salary expenses
|
633 250
|
566 452
|
Depreciation and write-downs
|
105 427
|
104 930
|
Other operating expenses
|
185 422
|
180 031
|
Operating expenses
|
1 315 146
|
1 156 291
|
Operating profit
|
147 233
|
118 602
|
Income on investments accounted for by the equity method
|
- 20
|
|
Finance income
|
53 861
|
46 243
|
Finance expense
|
- 58 809
|
- 54 803
|
Net finance items
|
- 4 968
|
- 8 560
|
Profit before tax
|
142 265
|
110 042
|
Tax expense
|
41 123
|
26 436
|
Profit after tax from discontinued operations
|
101 142
|
83 606
|
Assets and liability for TeleComputing classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2015
|
||
Intangible assets
|
771 716
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
5 173
|
|
Tangible assets
|
174 850
|
|
Other financial non-current assets
|
73
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
951 811
|
|
Short-term receivables
|
211 733
|
|
Bank deposits
|
- 68 291
|
|
Total current receivables
|
143 442
|
|
Total assets classified as held for sale
|
1 095 253
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
||
Pension obligations
|
333
|
|
Deferred tax
|
56 376
|
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
56 710
|
|
Current liabilities
|
||
Tax payable
|
33 582
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
381 324
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
414 905
|
|
Total liabilities classified as held for sale
|
471 615
|
|
Cash flows from business held for sale
|
2015
|
2014
|
Net cash flows from operations
|
248 810
|
204 833
|
Net cash flows used in investment activities
|
-93 189
|
-105 701
|
Net cash flows used in finance activities
|
-109 403
|
-124 970
|
Net cash flows from/-used in business held for sale
|
46 218
|
-25 838
|